tibrewalpratik17 commented on code in PR #13837:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13837#discussion_r1723625799
##########
pinot-connectors/pinot-flink-connector/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/connector/flink/sink/FlinkSegmentWriter.java:
##########
@@ -124,12 +132,26 @@ public void init(TableConfig tableConfig, Schema schema,
Map<String, String> bat
"batchConfigMaps must contain only 1 BatchConfig for table: %s",
_tableNameWithType);
Map<String, String> batchConfigMap =
_batchIngestionConfig.getBatchConfigMaps().get(0);
+ batchConfigMap.put(BatchConfigProperties.PARTITION_ID,
Integer.toString(_indexOfSubtask));
+ batchConfigMap.put(BatchConfigProperties.SEQUENCE_ID,
Integer.toString(_seqId));
Review Comment:
Will this not always put the sequence-id as 0 in all scenarios? Can this
cause conflicts when creation time is same as upsert table might end up
replacing the old segment?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
