merlimat commented on a change in pull request #3962: Feature / Interceptor for 
negative ack redelivery
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/3962#discussion_r271134069
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
pulsar-client/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/client/impl/ConsumerInterceptors.java
 ##########
 @@ -109,9 +110,29 @@ public void onAcknowledge(Consumer<T> consumer, MessageId 
messageId, Throwable e
      * @param exception exception returned by broker.
      */
     public void onAcknowledgeCumulative(Consumer<T> consumer, MessageId 
messageId, Throwable exception) {
-        for (int i = 0; i < interceptors.size(); i++) {
+        for (ConsumerInterceptor<T> interceptor : interceptors) {
             try {
-                interceptors.get(i).onAcknowledgeCumulative(consumer, 
messageId, exception);
+                interceptor.onAcknowledgeCumulative(consumer, messageId, 
exception);
+            } catch (Exception e) {
+                log.warn("Error executing interceptor onAcknowledgeCumulative 
callback ", e);
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * This method will be called when a redelivery from a negative 
acknowledge occurs.
+     * <p>
+     * This method calls {@link 
ConsumerInterceptor#onNegativeAckRedelivery(Consumer, Set<MessageId>)} method 
for each interceptor.
+     * <p>
+     * This method does not throw exceptions. Exceptions thrown by any of 
interceptors in the chain are logged, but not propagated.
+     *
+     * @param consumer the consumer which contains the interceptors
+     * @param messageIds set of messages ids being redelivery.
+     */
+    public void onNegativeAckRedelivery(Consumer<T> consumer, Set<MessageId> 
messageIds) {
 
 Review comment:
   Regarding the naming of this method, I think it might get a bit misleading 
because the redelivery might actually get to a different consumer. Eg. 
ConsumerA calls Nack() and after 1 min ConsumerB will get the message again.
   
   Would it be more intuitive to have the method called `onNegativeAck()` and 
call it as soon as the app calls `consumer.negativeAcknowledgement()`?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to