lhotari commented on PR #11: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-reactive/pull/11#issuecomment-1291583281
Before proceeding, I think that we need to do experiments of possibly both approaches, 1) and 2) and stick with the approach. The first approach is simpler to implement. The second approach could contain some generic type challenges, but could result in a better API eventually for supporting multiple RS implementations. One notable detail is that R2DBC doesn't provide RS implementation specific API at all. We have also that choice that we decide to stick with Project Reactor for the APIs and only accept RS publishers as input (#1) which has already been implemented. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
