thetumbled commented on PR #18390: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/18390#issuecomment-1309899548
> > Nice catch! And I think the `ConcurrentLongLongPairHashMap.Section#forEach` method may have the same problem. Could you help to confirm it? > >  i find that, even if there is any thread acquired write lock and trigger shrink/expand process, the local variable `table` will not be updated, so the index used in loop will not exceed the bound. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
