lhotari commented on issue #22314: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/22314#issuecomment-2014471219
> if u have some time, can u let me know ur thoughts on the feasibility of having this functionality added? The current details are hopefully enough to enable that conversation - and if no immediate/obvious blockers or issues, I can spend some more time identifying all the changes, and continuing conversation on the dev email distribution. Thanks @damienburke yes, the plan you have presented looks good to me. > For example, when using Vault as an OIDC - while also providing apps a Vault agent to do the Vault auth - a clientID and secretID are not needed by the app (as again the OIDC/Vault auth is abstracted away) Just curious, how is this configured with the Pulsar client? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
