RobertIndie opened a new pull request, #22745:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22745

   <!--
   ### Contribution Checklist
     
     - PR title format should be *[type][component] summary*. For details, see 
*[Guideline - Pulsar PR Naming 
Convention](https://pulsar.apache.org/contribute/develop-semantic-title/)*. 
   
     - Fill out the template below to describe the changes contributed by the 
pull request. That will give reviewers the context they need to do the review.
     
     - Each pull request should address only one issue, not mix up code from 
multiple issues.
     
     - Each commit in the pull request has a meaningful commit message
   
     - Once all items of the checklist are addressed, remove the above text and 
this checklist, leaving only the filled out template below.
   -->
   
   Fixes #22345
   
   ### Motivation
   
   #### Root cause analysis
   
   Actually, the ledger will roll over here because it will fill up the current 
ledger:
   
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/6372b9c8f5448757cdb56dc70aaf0ebb52a1063e/managed-ledger/src/test/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/mledger/impl/ShadowManagedLedgerImplTest.java#L77
   
   Therefore, the source ML will update the managed ledger info. And the 
shadowML will get the updated MLInfo and update the LCE. So the assertion here 
is incorrect because the LCE will be updated:
   
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/6372b9c8f5448757cdb56dc70aaf0ebb52a1063e/managed-ledger/src/test/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/mledger/impl/ShadowManagedLedgerImplTest.java#L79-L81
   
   The process of updating MLInfo from sourceML to shadowML is asynchronous. 
This causes the test to be unreliable.
   
   Regarding the change for this:
   
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/6372b9c8f5448757cdb56dc70aaf0ebb52a1063e/managed-ledger/src/test/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/mledger/impl/ShadowManagedLedgerImplTest.java#L151-L154
   We have removed one entry addition operation in the test. Therefore, the 
final count for the ledger size will be one less.
   ### Modifications
   
   - Remove incorrect assertions from the tests
   - Improve the test by using Awaitility
   - Move the tests out of flaky group
   
   ### Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
   <!-- DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION. CHECK THE PROPER BOX ONLY. -->
   
   *If the box was checked, please highlight the changes*
   
   - [ ] Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
   - [ ] The public API
   - [ ] The schema
   - [ ] The default values of configurations
   - [ ] The threading model
   - [ ] The binary protocol
   - [ ] The REST endpoints
   - [ ] The admin CLI options
   - [ ] The metrics
   - [ ] Anything that affects deployment
   
   ### Documentation
   
   <!-- DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION. CHECK THE PROPER BOX ONLY. -->
   
   - [ ] `doc` <!-- Your PR contains doc changes. -->
   - [ ] `doc-required` <!-- Your PR changes impact docs and you will update 
later -->
   - [x] `doc-not-needed` <!-- Your PR changes do not impact docs -->
   - [ ] `doc-complete` <!-- Docs have been already added -->
   
   ### Matching PR in forked repository
   
   PR in forked repository: <!-- ENTER URL HERE -->
   
   <!--
   After opening this PR, the build in apache/pulsar will fail and instructions 
will
   be provided for opening a PR in the PR author's forked repository.
   
   apache/pulsar pull requests should be first tested in your own fork since 
the 
   apache/pulsar CI based on GitHub Actions has constrained resources and quota.
   GitHub Actions provides separate quota for pull requests that are executed 
in 
   a forked repository.
   
   The tests will be run in the forked repository until all PR review comments 
have
   been handled, the tests pass and the PR is approved by a reviewer.
   -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pulsar.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to