lhotari commented on issue #22601: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/22601#issuecomment-2125182828
> seem change to read only actually change the behavior... :( > please ignore my previous comments. `.duplicate()` or `.retainedDuplicate()` should be sufficient to replace the use of `.copy()` in ByteBufPair. I'm asking Netty maintainers for some advice and keeping PR #22760 as draft until there's a reply. `.copy()` itself has a bug which I've reported as netty/netty#14068, however I don't currently see a reason why a copy would be needed at all. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
