frankjkelly commented on issue #403: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/issues/403#issuecomment-2129543290
> > This was left out on purpose from the Go client lib. Ack timeout was the wrong solution we initially applied. Later we introduced negative Acks which are better suited for most of the cases (though we couldn't remove ack timeout for compatibility reasons there). > > What if consumer crashed after consuming message but before ack/nack the message? Does broker redeliver in that case? Good question @merlimat do you know? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pulsar.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
