nodece commented on code in PR #23002: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23002#discussion_r1666959049
########## pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/admin/impl/PersistentTopicsBase.java: ########## @@ -742,7 +742,17 @@ protected void internalDeletePartitionedTopic(AsyncResponse asyncResponse, .thenCompose(partitionedMeta -> { final int numPartitions = partitionedMeta.partitions; if (numPartitions < 1) { - return CompletableFuture.completedFuture(null); + return pulsar().getNamespaceService().checkNonPartitionedTopicExists(topicName) + .thenApply(exists -> { + if (exists) { + throw new RestException(Response.Status.CONFLICT, + String.format("%s is a non-partitioned topic. Instead of calling" Review Comment: Does `Instead of calling delete-partitioned-topic please call delete.` make sense? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pulsar.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org