BewareMyPower commented on code in PR #24222:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/24222#discussion_r2126217163


##########
pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/admin/impl/PersistentTopicsBase.java:
##########
@@ -5489,4 +5489,131 @@ protected 
CompletableFuture<AutoSubscriptionCreationOverride> internalGetAutoSub
                             return null;
                         }));
     }
+
+    protected CompletableFuture<MessageId> 
internalGetMessageIDByIndexAsync(Long index, boolean authoritative) {
+        if (!pulsar().getBrokerService().isBrokerEntryMetadataEnabled()) {
+            return FutureUtil.failedFuture(new 
RestException(Status.PRECONDITION_FAILED,
+                    "GetMessageIDByIndex is not allowed when broker entry 
metadata is disabled"));
+        }
+        if (index == null || index < 0) {
+            return FutureUtil.failedFuture(new RestException(Status.NOT_FOUND,
+                    "Invalid message index: " + index));
+        }
+        int partitionIndex = topicName.getPartitionIndex();
+        CompletableFuture<Void> future = 
validateTopicOperationAsync(topicName, TopicOperation.PEEK_MESSAGES);
+        return future.thenCompose(__ -> {
+                    if (topicName.isGlobal()) {
+                        return 
validateGlobalNamespaceOwnershipAsync(namespaceName);
+                    } else {
+                        return CompletableFuture.completedFuture(null);
+                    }
+                }).thenCompose(__ -> {
+                    if (topicName.isPartitioned()) {
+                        return CompletableFuture.completedFuture(null);
+                    } else {
+                        return getPartitionedTopicMetadataAsync(topicName, 
authoritative, false)
+                                .thenAccept(topicMetadata -> {
+                                    if (topicMetadata.partitions > 0) {
+                                        log.warn("[{}] Not supported 
getMessageIdByIndex operation on "
+                                                        + "partitioned-topic 
{}", clientAppId(), topicName);
+                                        throw new 
RestException(Status.METHOD_NOT_ALLOWED,
+                                                "GetMessageIDByIndex is not 
allowed on partitioned-topic");
+                                    }
+                                });
+                    }
+                }).thenCompose(ignore -> 
validateTopicOwnershipAsync(topicName, authoritative))
+                .thenCompose(__ -> getTopicReferenceAsync(topicName))
+                .thenCompose(topic -> {
+                    if (!(topic instanceof PersistentTopic persistentTopic)) {
+                        log.error("[{}] Get message id by index on a 
non-persistent topic {} is not allowed",
+                                clientAppId(), topicName);
+                        return FutureUtil.failedFuture(new 
RestException(Status.METHOD_NOT_ALLOWED,
+                                "Get message id by index on a non-persistent 
topic is not allowed"));
+                    }
+                    ManagedLedger managedLedger = 
persistentTopic.getManagedLedger();
+                    return findMessageIndexByPosition(
+                            
PositionFactory.create(managedLedger.getFirstPosition().getLedgerId(), 0),
+                            managedLedger)
+                            .thenCompose(firstIndex -> {
+                                if (index < firstIndex) {
+                                    return 
CompletableFuture.completedFuture(PositionFactory.EARLIEST);
+                                } else {
+                                    return 
managedLedger.asyncFindPosition(entry -> {
+                                        try {
+                                            Long messageIndex = 
getIndexFromEntry(entry);
+                                            if (messageIndex == null) {
+                                                return false; // Skip messages 
without index
+                                            } else {
+                                                // If the message index is 
less than the requested index,
+                                                // we continue searching
+                                                return messageIndex < index;
+                                            }
+                                        } catch (IOException e) {
+                                            log.error("Error deserialize 
message for message position find", e);
+                                            return false;
+                                        } finally {
+                                            entry.release();
+                                        }
+                                    });
+                                }
+                            }).thenCompose(position -> {
+                                Position lastPosition = 
managedLedger.getLastConfirmedEntry();
+                                if (position == null || 
position.compareTo(lastPosition) > 0) {
+                                    return FutureUtil.failedFuture(new 
RestException(Status.NOT_FOUND,
+                                            "Message not found for index " + 
index));
+                                } else {
+                                    return 
CompletableFuture.completedFuture(position);
+                                }
+                            });
+                }).thenCompose(position -> CompletableFuture.completedFuture(
+                        new MessageIdImpl(position.getLedgerId(), 
position.getEntryId(), partitionIndex)));
+    }
+
+    protected CompletableFuture<Long> findMessageIndexByPosition(Position 
position, ManagedLedger managedLedger) {
+        CompletableFuture<Long> indexFuture = new CompletableFuture<>();
+        managedLedger.asyncReadEntry(position, new 
AsyncCallbacks.ReadEntryCallback() {
+            @Override
+            public void readEntryComplete(Entry entry, Object ctx) {
+                try {
+                    Long index = getIndexFromEntry(entry);
+                    if (index == null) {
+                        indexFuture.completeExceptionally(new 
RestException(Status.PRECONDITION_FAILED,
+                                "Broker entry metadata is not present in the 
message"));
+                    } else if (index < 0) {
+                        indexFuture.completeExceptionally(new 
RestException(Status.PRECONDITION_FAILED,
+                                "Invalid message index: " + index));
+                    } else {
+                        indexFuture.complete(index);
+                    }
+                } catch (IOException e) {
+                    indexFuture.completeExceptionally(new 
RestException(Status.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR,
+                            "Failed to get index from entry: " + 
e.getMessage()));
+                } finally {
+                    entry.release();
+                }
+            }
+
+            @Override
+            public void readEntryFailed(ManagedLedgerException exception, 
Object ctx) {
+                log.error("[{}] Failed to read position {} on topic {}",
+                        clientAppId(), position, topicName, exception);
+                indexFuture.completeExceptionally(exception);
+            }
+        }, null);
+        return indexFuture;
+    }
+
+
+    private static Long getIndexFromEntry(Entry entry) throws IOException {
+        try {
+            final var brokerEntryMetadata = 
Commands.parseBrokerEntryMetadataIfExist(entry.getDataBuffer());
+            if (brokerEntryMetadata != null && brokerEntryMetadata.hasIndex()) 
{
+                return brokerEntryMetadata.getIndex();
+            } else {
+                return null;
+            }
+        } catch (Throwable throwable) {
+            throw new IOException(throwable);

Review Comment:
   The benefit of checked exceptions is to force the caller to handle the 
exception, which should be a "known" exception. However, the `IOException` 
thrown in this method is just a wrapper on an "unknown" exception.
   
   A normal practice of exception handling should be:
   - Fail fast or propagate the exception for unknown exceptions, because the 
caller never knows how to handle it correctly
   - Handle the known exception according to the method's API docs
   
   Specifically, for unknown exceptions, if propagating it could bring 
unexpected result, we should catch `Throwable` and handle the case well, for 
example,
   
   ```java
   @RequiredArgsConstructor
   public class Main {
   
       private final Function<Integer, Integer> func;
   
       public CompletableFuture<Integer> f(int x) {
           final var future = new CompletableFuture<Integer>();
           new Thread(() -> future.complete(func.apply(x))).start();
           return future;
       }
   
       public static void main(String[] args) {
           final var main = new Main(x -> 1 / x);
           final var result = main.f(0).join();
           System.out.println(result);
       }
   }
   ```
   
   To avoid the future of `Main#f` is never returned, we should add a catch 
clause for it:
   
   ```java
               try {
                   future.complete(func.apply(x));
               } catch (Throwable throwable) {
                   future.completeExceptionally(throwable);
               }
   ```
   
   But adding an additional method with exception signature is bad:
   
   ```java
       public CompletableFuture<Integer> f(int x) {
           final var future = new CompletableFuture<Integer>();
           new Thread(() -> {
               try {
                   future.complete(apply(x));
               } catch (IOException e) {
                   future.completeExceptionally(e);
               }
           }).start();
           return future;
       }
       
       public int apply(int x) throws IOException {
           try {
               return func.apply(x);
           } catch (Throwable throwable) {
               throw new IOException(throwable);
           }
       }
   ```
   
   In this case, it's better to keep `getIndexFromEntry` simple without the 
exception signature and catch the `Throwable` when calling it like the 
suggestion 
[here](https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/24222/files#r2125780470).
   
   



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to