lhotari commented on issue #24490: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/24490#issuecomment-3151228977
> [@lhotari](https://github.com/lhotari) For benchmarking and getting these results, we are using [OMB](https://github.com/datastax/openmessaging-benchmark) testing with the following configurations. > > * driver > It's in the below tar file with the following path driver-pulsar/pulsar-shared-subscription.yaml > * workload > [1m-10-topics-3-partitions-100b-shared-subs.yaml](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HBgvRkhv3fG_HYnlM4BGYVx-i-0FH8Oe/view?usp=sharing) > * broker.conf > [broker-starlight.conf](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FuIHzFVEdDxKKsQBqZUR6cYKXq9-E8fm/view?usp=drive_link) > * with this [openmessaging-benchmark-0.0.4-SNAPSHOT](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1f9bQnbgskIELal3C05gp9srETZH-0ycB/view?usp=drive_link) tar. > > Command being used to run the tests is `bin/benchmark --drivers "driver-pulsar/pulsar-shared-subscription.yaml --extra" --workload "1m-10-topics-3-partitions-100b-shared-subs.yaml" ` Would you be able to run these tests on your own instance and setup? Feel free to reach out for any help required. @Ganesh-Chandra Thanks for sharing. It would be a useful contribution to the Apache Pulsar project to track down this issue. My first suggestion would be to test with the latest Apache Pulsar 4.0.6 image to see if the problem can be reproduced in the latest release version. If it reproduces, then test with ``` dispatcherRetryBackoffInitialTimeInMs=0 dispatcherRetryBackoffMaxTimeInMs=0 ``` Could you perform these test runs? I have the assumption that implementing #24499 might be required to address the performance regression, but the above test runs would provide a useful baseline when comparing to changes after #24499 has been implemented. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
