codelipenghui commented on a change in pull request #5824: Publish a blog post 
to apache pulsar blog
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/5824#discussion_r355367184
 
 

 ##########
 File path: site2/website/blog/2019-12-04-Apache-Pulsar-2-4-2.md
 ##########
 @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+---
+author: Xiaolong Ran
+authorURL: https://twitter.com/wolf4j1
+title: Apache Pulsar 2.4.2
+---
+
+We are glad to publish Apache Pulsar 2.4.2. This is the result of a huge 
+effort from the community, with over 110 commits, general improvements and bug 
fixes.
+
+Check out the <b>[release notes](../release-notes.md/)</b> for a detailed list 
of 
+the changes, with links to the relevant pull requests, discussions and 
documentation.
+
+Regarding improvements and bug fixes introduced, I just want to highlight here 
a tiny subset of them:
+
+<!--truncate-->
+
+- In Pulsar 2.4.1, we instead of using a shaded JAR to start a java function 
instance, use different classLoaders to 
+load the internal pulsar code, user code, and the interfaces that the two 
interacts with each other. This is a good 
+change, but this change will cause the following two problems:
 
 Review comment:
   We may not need a new line here

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to