eolivelli commented on pull request #9860: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/9860#issuecomment-795544661
> If the feature in the pulsar-client consume depends on the pulsar-perf produce -mk, looks a little weird. Is it better to move it to the pulsar-perf consume? It does not fit pulsar-perf consume: - pulsar-perf consume is more about measuring performances, it does not care about the contents of the messages - pulsar-perf uses the MessageListener and it is pretty harder to introduce fail fast mechanisms ` pulsar-perf produce -mk` is just an example, you can use any workload generator (I am also using https://github.com/nosqlbench/nosqlbench for instance) so there is not an hard dependency between these two tools ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
