codelipenghui commented on a change in pull request #10824:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/10824#discussion_r645459380



##########
File path: 
pulsar-broker/src/test/java/org/apache/pulsar/client/impl/DispatchAccordingPermitsTests.java
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.pulsar.client.impl;
+
+import org.apache.pulsar.client.admin.PulsarAdminException;
+import org.apache.pulsar.client.admin.Topics;
+import org.apache.pulsar.client.api.Consumer;
+import org.apache.pulsar.client.api.MessageId;
+import org.apache.pulsar.client.api.Producer;
+import org.apache.pulsar.client.api.ProducerConsumerBase;
+import org.apache.pulsar.client.api.PulsarClientException;
+import org.apache.pulsar.client.api.Schema;
+import org.apache.pulsar.client.api.SubscriptionInitialPosition;
+import org.apache.pulsar.client.api.SubscriptionType;
+import org.apache.pulsar.common.policies.data.TopicStats;
+import org.testng.Assert;
+import org.testng.annotations.AfterMethod;
+import org.testng.annotations.BeforeMethod;
+import org.testng.annotations.Test;
+
+import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
+
+@Test(groups = "broker-impl")
+public class DispatchAccordingPermitsTests extends ProducerConsumerBase {
+
+    @Override
+    @BeforeMethod
+    public void setup() throws Exception {
+        super.internalSetup();
+        super.producerBaseSetup();
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    @AfterMethod(alwaysRun = true)
+    public void cleanup() throws Exception {
+        super.internalCleanup();
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * The test case is to simulate dispatch batches with different batch size 
to the consumer.
+     * 1. The consumer has 1000 available permits
+     * 2. The producer send batches with different batch size
+     *
+     * According the batch average size dispatching, the broker will dispatch 
all the batches to the consumer
+     */
+    @Test
+    public void testFlowPermitsWithMultiBatchesDispatch() throws 
PulsarAdminException, PulsarClientException {

Review comment:
       @eolivelli I have merged the PR, will try to investigate the problem 
with the partitioned topic. I have test 100 partitions on the standalone, seem 
not able to reproduce the issue. Will try to deploy to a real cluster for 
testing. Will try to write a UT for partitioned case if it can be reproduced




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to