redlsz opened a new issue, #10949:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/10949

   ### Before Creating the Enhancement Request
   
   - [x] I have confirmed that this should be classified as an enhancement 
rather than a bug/feature.
   
   
   ### Summary
   
   With popConsumerKVServiceEnable = true, a queue's consumer offset is only 
advanced by pop requests, and the committed value always lags one round behind 
the real position. 
   
   There is no broker-side task that closes this gap, so once a consumer drains 
the backlog, acks everything and goes offline, the offset stays behind 
indefinitely and reported lag never reaches zero. 
   
   Adding background convergence would make the offset reflect the actual 
consumption position regardless of client polling behavior.
   
   ### Motivation
   
   Ack no longer advances the offset (PopConsumerService#ackAsync only deletes 
the record), and the commit now rides on pop using the start offset of the 
current batch, while the real watermark nextBeginOffset goes only to 
pullOffsetTable. 
   
   No background task closes the gap: run() only revives, and 
PopConsumerCache#cleanupRecords skips the commit once the queue drains because 
getMinOffsetInBuffer() returns -1 — with enablePopBufferMerge=false there is no 
periodic committer at all. 
   
   The legacy PopBufferMergeService path does not need one, since ack itself 
commits nextBeginOffset.
   
   ### Describe the Solution You'd Like
   
   Add a periodic broker-side task in PopConsumerService that converges 
offsetTable toward pullOffsetTable, bounded by the minimum in-flight offset 
still held in the cache, so it works for both enablePopBufferMerge values 
without depending on any further client request.
   
   ### Describe Alternatives You've Considered
   
   /
   
   ### Additional Context
   
   _No response_


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to