[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-47?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Kleppmann updated SAMZA-47:
----------------------------------
Attachment: SAMZA-47.patch
Since the Github experiment didn't work out, here's the same as the pull
request, in Reviewboard form: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18357/
I changed one thing since the pull request: in LevelDbKeyValueStore, renamed
the {{config}} parameter to {{storeConfig}} (to clarify that it's just the
configuration of that particular store, not the entire job config).
Also attaching the latest version as a patch.
> LevelDB and L1 cache use the same configuration value in KeyValueStorageEngine
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SAMZA-47
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-47
> Project: Samza
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.7.0
> Reporter: Jay Kreps
> Assignee: Martin Kleppmann
> Attachments: SAMZA-47.patch
>
>
> Both seem to key off of
> cache.size
> This is not right. The L1 cache is caching a number of objects and leveldb is
> allocating a number of bytes. In general the leveldb cache should be big
> (tens of MBs) and the L1 cache small (a few thousand).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)