[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14194465#comment-14194465
]
Martin Kleppmann commented on SAMZA-452:
----------------------------------------
Good spot. In the second hunk, would it make sense to give fully-qualified
class names for all the possible job.factory.class factories? It's a bit odd
how YarnJobFactory is singled out. You could also add a link to
configuration-table.html#job-factory-class.
> Use full package name in for the job.factory.class in configuration document
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SAMZA-452
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-452
> Project: Samza
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: docs
> Reporter: Yan Fang
> Assignee: Yan Fang
> Attachments: SAMZA-452.patch
>
>
> In
> http://samza.incubator.apache.org/learn/documentation/latest/jobs/configuration.html
> , we are using
> {code}
> job.factory.class=samza.job.local.ThreadJobFactory
> {code}
> This is kind of misleading. We should use the full package name to make this
> configuration usable.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
