DanielLeens commented on PR #11140:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/11140#issuecomment-4957122582

   Thanks for the extra rereview.
   
   On this unchanged head, Daniel's source-side conclusion is still clear for 
me. The remaining gate is still the stale-head `Build` failure Daniel already 
called out before, and this branch is still behind the latest `dev`.
   
   So the lowest-cost next step is still to sync with the latest `dev` and 
rerun `Build` first. If the same failing jobs still reproduce on the refreshed 
head after the sync, please drop the updated check link here and I can help 
narrow it down further.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to