DanielLeens commented on PR #11953: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/11953#issuecomment-5396343405
Thanks @dybyte for the follow-up — that matches the CI note I left in my review: the "Build" check here is just a pointer to a workflow run on the contributor's fork, and that fork currently has zero Actions runs at any SHA, so it's a fork settings issue rather than anything wrong with this PR's content. @lce-mo once Actions are enabled on your fork (Settings -> Actions -> General -> Allow all actions), a push (even an empty commit or a rebase onto latest `dev`) should trigger a real CI run. While you're making a commit to trigger CI, it would also be a good time to address the two blockers from my review above (`date_format(...)` -> `FORMATDATETIME(...)` in the transform, and removing/correcting the `filename_num` key), so both fixes and a fresh CI run land together. Happy to take another look once that's pushed. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
