DanielLeens commented on PR #11868:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/11868#issuecomment-5459188917

   CI record update, @JeremyXin — following up on my 2026-08-22 note again, 
since the `Build` check has since been rerun many more times (this fork run is 
now on attempt 18) without landing on a clean, unrelated-flake-free result yet.
   
   The most recent completed attempt on this exact head (`9b95505c7`) failed on 
two jobs, both again unrelated to this PR's Hazelcast join-port fix:
   
   - `unit-test (11, ubuntu-latest)`: 
`SeaTunnelClientTest.testGetMultiTableJobMetrics` — an assertion failure 
(`expected: <true> but was: <false>`) in an unrelated metrics-reporting test; 
nothing in this PR touches `seatunnel-engine-client` or job metrics.
   - `jdbc-connectors-it-part-6 (8, ubuntu-latest)`: `JdbcHanaIT` — a 
Testcontainers `ContainerLaunchException` failing to start the 
`saplabs/hanaexpress` image; a Docker/infra flake, unrelated to Hazelcast 
config or the test classes this PR modified.
   
   Neither failure touches `AbstractSeaTunnelServerTest`, `WorkerTagTest`, 
`OptionRulesApiTest`, or any Hazelcast join/port-count code path. My "Ready to 
merge" conclusion still stands technically — but at this point the pattern 
across 18 rerun attempts is a different unrelated flaky job failing each time 
rather than converging to green, which looks like general CI/Docker capacity 
churn on this run rather than something a rerun reliably fixes. I would not 
keep force-rerunning; instead, please flag this to a maintainer with write 
access so they can either merge on the strength of the code review once any one 
run comes back clean, or advise if there's a known infra issue affecting these 
jobs right now.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to