DanielLeens commented on PR #12366:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12366#issuecomment-6143526813

   Thanks @201811510411lw for syncing with `dev` and for pinning the CI 
comparison down so precisely. I checked it independently, and your reading is 
correct.
   
   - Your PR head `b43bc2876`: the only failing jobs in the fork run are 
`all-connectors-it-2` on JDK 11 and JDK 17. In the JDK 11 log, 
`CassandraIT.testCassandra:134` and 
`CassandraIT.testCassandraMultiTableSource:144` fail with `expected: <0> but 
was: <1>`, and the log contains the `Direct buffer memory` error from the Flink 
1.20.1 taskmanager.
   - Current `dev` (`b0f6feddf9`, run 38340962420): the same lane 
`all-connectors-it-2` (JDK 11 and 17) is red, with the same two assertions at 
the same lines, again on invocation `[4]` of the parameterized `TestContainer` 
(the Flink 1.20.1 container).
   
   So this failure reproduces on the base branch without this PR, and the diff 
here (Paimon multi-table sink routing) does not touch the Cassandra connector, 
its E2E module or the Flink container setup. I do not see a source-level 
blocker from the CI side.
   
   Next step: there is nothing to change in this PR for that lane. Please just 
leave it as is; a rerun of the failed jobs will keep failing until a fix lands 
on `dev`, so I would hold off on reruns and only re-run once `dev` is green for 
`all-connectors-it-2` (a sync with the latest `dev` at that point is enough). 
My code-level conclusion from the previous round is unchanged.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to