[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15023714#comment-15023714
 ] 

Lenni Kuff commented on SENTRY-960:
-----------------------------------

Hi [~sravya], after more consideration I agree with the fact that Hive 
whitelists are too restrictive. We should go with your blacklist approach until 
Hive is fixed. +1 on that patch. Thanks for the thourough investigation. 

> Sentry no longer enforces it's whitelist
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SENTRY-960
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-960
>             Project: Sentry
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Sentry
>            Reporter: Ryan P
>            Assignee: Sravya Tirukkovalur
>         Attachments: SENTRY-960.10.patch, SENTRY-960.11.patch, 
> SENTRY-960.12.patch, SENTRY-960.2.patch, SENTRY-960.3.patch, 
> SENTRY-960.4.patch, SENTRY-960.4.patch, SENTRY-960.5.patch, 
> SENTRY-960.6.patch, SENTRY-960.7.patch, SENTRY-960.8.patch, 
> SENTRY-960.9.patch, SENTRY-960.patch
>
>
> HiveSemanticAnalyzerHookContext no longer includes built-in functions as an 
> input to it's Read Entities. This change hides built in functions from 
> HiveAuthzBindingHook which is a huge security hole. 
> Failing to enforce the whitelist will allow users to execute such functions 
> as REFLECT and JAVA_METHOD. 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/ReflectUDF



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to