[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15135482#comment-15135482
]
Colin Ma edited comment on SENTRY-1051 at 2/6/16 2:38 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------
[~coheig], [~sravya], I also worked on the SENTRY-1004 to remove the duplicated
Privilege for every component.
IMO, components needn't their own Privilege(like DBWildcardPrivilege,
SearchWildcardPrivilege, etc). Sentry should have a common privilege for all
these components.
The compare of action should also be improved in Privilege.imply().
BitFieldAction was created in Sentry for a long time, it's a better way to
compare the action and should be used in Privilege.imply().
was (Author: colinma):
[~coheig], [~sravya], I also worked on the SENTRY-1004 to remove the duplicated
Privilege for every component.
IMO, components needn't their own Privilege(like DBWildcardPrivilege,
SearchWildcardPrivilege, etc). Sentry should have a common privilege for all
these components.
The compare of action should also be improvement in Privilege.imply().
BitFieldAction was created in Sentry for a long time, it's a better way to
compare the action and should be used in Privilege.imply().
> The policy Privilege implementations could be consolidated
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SENTRY-1051
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1051
> Project: Sentry
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Colm O hEigeartaigh
> Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.7.0
>
> Attachments:
> 0001-SENTRY-1051-The-policy-Privilege-implementations-cou.patch
>
>
> The policy Privilege implementations could be consolidated as they all share
> similar code.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
