This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

epugh pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/solr.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
     new f37d08719d6 SOLR-14540: add an example clarifying the use case. (#499)
f37d08719d6 is described below

commit f37d08719d6b2f5afe9dbb87cb273afbda799bfb
Author: Mikhail Khludnev <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Fri Jan 13 19:40:15 2023 +0300

    SOLR-14540: add an example clarifying the use case. (#499)
    
    
    Co-authored-by: Eric Pugh <[email protected]>
---
 solr/solr-ref-guide/modules/query-guide/pages/json-query-dsl.adoc | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/solr/solr-ref-guide/modules/query-guide/pages/json-query-dsl.adoc 
b/solr/solr-ref-guide/modules/query-guide/pages/json-query-dsl.adoc
index 9ae5267227f..85544cbd5c7 100644
--- a/solr/solr-ref-guide/modules/query-guide/pages/json-query-dsl.adoc
+++ b/solr/solr-ref-guide/modules/query-guide/pages/json-query-dsl.adoc
@@ -449,8 +449,10 @@ Tags will not affect a query unless they are referenced by 
some other part of th
 == Faceting Nested Documents
 
 This paragraph binds many features together.
-Basically it's an example of filter exclusions for nested documents when 
facets are counted over child document  fields, but facet counts roll up in 
parent document counts.
-Let's go on item by item:
+Basically it's an example of filter exclusions for nested documents when 
facets are counted over child
+document fields, but facet counts roll up in parent document counts.  A 
typical scenario where you might
+need to do this is if you are displaying filters for products (parents) with 
SKUs with various colour/size
+options (children). Let's go on item by item:
 
 * _Filter exclusion_ is usually necessary when multiple filter values can be 
applied to each field.
 This is also also known as drill-sideways facets.

Reply via email to