[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rupert Westenthaler resolved STANBOL-1064.
------------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

implemented with http://svn.apache.org/r1480676
                
> Ignore "link multiple matchable token in chunk" for chunks that do already 
> contain a linkable token.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STANBOL-1064
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1064
>             Project: Stanbol
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Enhancement Engines
>            Reporter: Rupert Westenthaler
>            Assignee: Rupert Westenthaler
>            Priority: Minor
>
> This is about the following  option of the EntityhubLinkingEngine
> * lmmtip [''/true/false]::boolean - the Link Multiple Matchable Tokens in 
> Phrases parameter. As the name says it allows to enable/disable the linking 
> of multiple matchable tokens within the same Chunk. This is especially 
> important if Proper Noun Linking is active, as it allows to detect 'named 
> entities' that are constituted by two common nouns. NOTE that 'lmmtip' is 
> short for 'lmmtip=true'
> The current implementation will convert the first matchable token of a chunk 
> if it does contain multiple matchable tokens. Because of this in the chunk 
>     "Express Tribune newspaper reports"
> the token "newspaper" would be converted to a linkable one. However this is 
> unintended as "Express" and "Tribune" are already linkable tokens and would 
> anyway consider other matchable tokens for entity lookups.
> Because of that 'lmmtip' should be deactivated in Chunks that do already 
> contain matchable tokens.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to