Author: cmpilato
Date: Tue May 17 09:43:52 2011
New Revision: 1104086

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1104086&view=rev
Log:
Cast some votes.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?rev=1104086&r1=1104085&r2=1104086&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS Tue May 17 09:43:52 2011
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ Candidate changes:
    Branch:
      ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-r917523
    Votes:
-     +1: kameshj (with r878590 and r916286 groups)
+     +1: kameshj, cmpilato
 
  * r1028084, r1028125, r1041638
    Fix JVM recognition on OS X Snow Leopard (10.6).
@@ -64,64 +64,12 @@ Candidate changes:
            didn't do a line-by-line review of the changes
      +0: danielsh (only touches java.m4)
 
- * 1.6.x-svn_fs_commit_txn branch
-   Have all of server-side Subversion, from svn_fs_commit_txn(),
-   through to mod_dav_svn, implement the documented (since 1.0.x)
-   behavior that svn_fs_commit_txn() and svn_repos_fs_commit_txn()
-   should indicate a successful commit by a valid returned revision
-   number, not by any returned error.  Now, regardless if
-   svn_fs_commit_txn()'s post commit FS processing (that's its new
-   official name) fails, svn_repos_fs_commit_txn() will run the
-   post-commit hook.  All code that uses svn_fs_commit_txn() and/or
-   svn_repos_fs_commit_txn() now uses the revision number to test if
-   the commit succeeded.
-   Justification:
-     Fixes bug reports on [email protected] where if post commit FS
-       processing fails, the client reports an error but the commit
-       succeeded, which is confusing for users.
-     Implementing the documented and correct behavior is a good thing.
-   Notes:
-     For a successful unit test pass, it requires that r1051632,
-       r1051638 and r1051751 listed above be merged previously.
-     The branch has many commits in it from trunk, which includes some
-       churn from reviews on trunk.  I recommend reviewing a cumulative
-       diff:
-       svn diff -r r1053420:r1053500 
^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-svn_fs_commit_txn
-     This merge doesn't address the client side behavior.
-   Branch:
-     ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-svn_fs_commit_txn
-   Note:
-     Adds a new private API, which would break 1.6.16 mod_dav_svn with
-     1.6.15 libsvn_repos; thread:
-     http://mid.gmane.org/[email protected]
-     http://mid.gmane.org/[email protected]
-   Note:
-     Found a potential issue in close_edit() during review, I would prefer to
-     see it fixed before merge.
-   Votes:
-     +1: blair, danielsh
-
  * ^/branches/1.6.x-r1053984
    Fix bug where committing a changelist was prevented by a file outside that
    changelist having unexpectedly changed special status.
    Justification:
      Local fix.  users@ reports.
    Votes:
-     +0: danielsh
-
- * 1.6.x-fsfs-begin-txn-deadlock
-   Fix a deadlock that can occur when two or more multithreaded
-   Subversion servers on the same system serve two or more fsfs
-   repositories.
-   Justification:
-     Avoiding deadlocks is a good thing.
-   Branch:
-    ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-fsfs-begin-txn-deadlock
-   Thread:
-     http://mid.gmane.org/[email protected]
-     http://mid.gmane.org/[email protected]
-   Votes:
-     +1: blair, danielsh
 
  * r962377, r962378, r1036978, r1037762, r1063572, r1063573, r1063592
    Fix issue #3641 svnsync handling of directory copyfrom.
@@ -138,9 +86,8 @@ Candidate changes:
    Notes:
      See also the r1036429 group.
    Votes:
-     +1: cmpilato (r962377, r962378 only)
-     +1: philip (r962377, r962378, r1063572, r1063573, r1063592 only)
-     +1: pburba
+     +1: philip (962377, r962378, r1063572, r1063573, r1063592 only)
+     +1: pburba, cmpilato
      -0: danielsh (authz concerns on the original fix)
 
  * r1074572
@@ -423,3 +370,56 @@ Approved changes:
                  that are currently nominated...so my +1 is conditional on
                  that fix being applied first.)
      +1: danielsh (pburba: a fix to #3641 was committed to trunk)
+
+
+ * 1.6.x-svn_fs_commit_txn branch
+   Have all of server-side Subversion, from svn_fs_commit_txn(),
+   through to mod_dav_svn, implement the documented (since 1.0.x)
+   behavior that svn_fs_commit_txn() and svn_repos_fs_commit_txn()
+   should indicate a successful commit by a valid returned revision
+   number, not by any returned error.  Now, regardless if
+   svn_fs_commit_txn()'s post commit FS processing (that's its new
+   official name) fails, svn_repos_fs_commit_txn() will run the
+   post-commit hook.  All code that uses svn_fs_commit_txn() and/or
+   svn_repos_fs_commit_txn() now uses the revision number to test if
+   the commit succeeded.
+   Justification:
+     Fixes bug reports on [email protected] where if post commit FS
+       processing fails, the client reports an error but the commit
+       succeeded, which is confusing for users.
+     Implementing the documented and correct behavior is a good thing.
+   Notes:
+     For a successful unit test pass, it requires that r1051632,
+       r1051638 and r1051751 listed above be merged previously.
+     The branch has many commits in it from trunk, which includes some
+       churn from reviews on trunk.  I recommend reviewing a cumulative
+       diff:
+       svn diff -r r1053420:r1053500 
^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-svn_fs_commit_txn
+     This merge doesn't address the client side behavior.
+   Branch:
+     ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-svn_fs_commit_txn
+   Note:
+     Adds a new private API, which would break 1.6.16 mod_dav_svn with
+     1.6.15 libsvn_repos; thread:
+     http://mid.gmane.org/[email protected]
+     http://mid.gmane.org/[email protected]
+   Note:
+     Found a potential issue in close_edit() during review, I would prefer to
+     see it fixed before merge.
+   Votes:
+     +1: blair, danielsh, cmpilato
+
+ * 1.6.x-fsfs-begin-txn-deadlock
+   Fix a deadlock that can occur when two or more multithreaded
+   Subversion servers on the same system serve two or more fsfs
+   repositories.
+   Justification:
+     Avoiding deadlocks is a good thing.
+   Branch:
+     ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-fsfs-begin-txn-deadlock
+   Thread:
+     http://mid.gmane.org/[email protected]
+     http://mid.gmane.org/[email protected]
+   Votes:
+     +1: blair, danielsh, cmpilato
+


Reply via email to