Author: markphip
Date: Tue May 17 13:34:54 2011
New Revision: 1104238

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1104238&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Veto r879766, with an explanation as to why.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?rev=1104238&r1=1104237&r2=1104238&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS Tue May 17 13:34:54 2011
@@ -15,22 +15,6 @@ Status of 1.6.17:
 Candidate changes:
 ==================
 
- * r879766
-   Fix issue #3498: Subversion password stores freeze Eclipse
-   Justification:
-     All subclipse users are in great need of this.
-   Branch:
-     Resolves a minor conflict in libsvn_auth_gnome_keyring/gnome_keyring.c
-     where the code changed was refactored on trunk.
-     ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-r39692
-   Votes:
-     +1: stylesen
-     +0: julianfoad (reviewed, not tested)
-     -0: rhuijben (needs more explanation: The not-interactive and no
-                   callback code paths should be more similar if the code
-                   works correctly. I think the not interactive code path
-                   needs the same fix).
-
  * r1028084, r1028125, r1041638
    Fix JVM recognition on OS X Snow Leopard (10.6).
    Justification:
@@ -278,6 +262,24 @@ Veto-blocked changes:
                   assert isn't even in 1.6.x.  I'm happy to remove this veto
                   if a proper backport branch is provided.)
 
+
+ * r879766
+   Fix issue #3498: Subversion password stores freeze Eclipse
+   Justification:
+     All subclipse users are in great need of this.
+   Branch:
+     Resolves a minor conflict in libsvn_auth_gnome_keyring/gnome_keyring.c
+     where the code changed was refactored on trunk.
+     ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-r39692
+   Votes:
+     +1: stylesen
+     +0: julianfoad (reviewed, not tested)
+     -0: rhuijben (needs more explanation: The not-interactive and no
+                   callback code paths should be more similar if the code
+                   works correctly. I think the not interactive code path
+                   needs the same fix).
+     -1: markphip (tested multiple builds of this and never saw it work).
+
 Approved changes:
 =================
 


Reply via email to