Author: julianfoad
Date: Fri Feb 13 18:32:55 2015
New Revision: 1659642

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1659642
Log:
* STATUS: Veto my own nomination of issue #4476 - svnsync with r0 mergeinfo.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1659642&r1=1659641&r2=1659642&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Fri Feb 13 18:32:55 2015
@@ -84,24 +84,6 @@ Candidate changes:
    Votes:
      +1: brane, breser
 
- * r1646230, r1646250, r1646253
-   Make svnsync strip any r0 references from mergeinfo -- issue #4476.
-   Justification:
-     Without this is was not possible to svnsync a repository that contained
-     this kind of mergeinfo that is now considered invalid but previously
-     could be committed.
-   Branch:
-     ^/subversion/branches/1.7.x-r1646250
-   Notes:
-     r1646250 contains the fix itself, and a test for it.
-     r1646253 removes some stray debug statements.
-     r1646230 is required for the test to work.
-     r1643074 (nominated separately) is required for the test to work.
-     I would recommend not backporting r1646250 without r1643074.
-     This is also nominated for 1.8.x.
-   Votes:
-     +1: julianfoad
-
  * r1646785, r1646786, r1646797
    Fix a pool handling bug in config variable expansion.
    Justification:
@@ -186,5 +168,20 @@ Veto-blocked changes:
                  was mismerged on release branch in r1643189, the merge that
                  was made broke swig-rb)
 
+ * r1646230, r1646250, r1646253, r1656893, r1657182, r1657195, r1657401
+   Make svnsync strip any r0 references from mergeinfo -- issue #4476.
+   Justification:
+     Without this is was not possible to svnsync a repository that contained
+     this kind of mergeinfo that is now considered invalid but previously
+     could be committed.
+   Branch:
+     ^/subversion/branches/1.7.x-r1646250
+   Notes:
+     r1643074 (nominated separately) is required for the test to work.
+     I would recommend not backporting r1646250 without r1643074.
+     This is also nominated for 1.8.x.
+   Votes:
+     -1: julianfoad (the test is failing; not essential for 1.7.x)
+
 Approved changes:
 =================


Reply via email to