Author: stsp
Date: Tue Apr 14 16:51:09 2015
New Revision: 1673465

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1673465
Log:
* STATUS: Vote for r1669746, approving.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS?rev=1673465&r1=1673464&r2=1673465&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS Tue Apr 14 16:51:09 2015
@@ -15,17 +15,6 @@ Status of 1.9.0:
 Release blockers for 1.9.0:
 ===========================
 
- * r1669746
-   Rename svn_fs_node_same to svn_fs_node_unchanged in FS API.
-   Justification:
-     This clarifies the new "node relationship" concept introduced in 1.9.
-     Neither calling it "same" (too strict) nor "equal" (too loose) would
-     imply the intended semantics.  The sloppy and easily misinterpreted
-     semantics of the similar svn_fs_compare_ids lead to false and fragile
-     code (e.g. issue #4542).  Let's not repeat this.
-   Votes:
-     +1: stefan2, philip
-
  * r1667233, r1667301
    Reject invalid get-location-segments requests in mod_dav_svn and svnserve.
    Justification:
@@ -341,3 +330,14 @@ Approved changes:
      voting.
    Votes:
      +1: stefan2
+
+ * r1669746
+   Rename svn_fs_node_same to svn_fs_node_unchanged in FS API.
+   Justification:
+     This clarifies the new "node relationship" concept introduced in 1.9.
+     Neither calling it "same" (too strict) nor "equal" (too loose) would
+     imply the intended semantics.  The sloppy and easily misinterpreted
+     semantics of the similar svn_fs_compare_ids lead to false and fragile
+     code (e.g. issue #4542).  Let's not repeat this.
+   Votes:
+     +1: stefan2, philip, stsp


Reply via email to