I expected the svn-role script to commit this backport last night but it seems something is wrong. I hope to take a look at it tonight.
/Daniel mån 20 apr. 2026 kl. 18:19 skrev <[email protected]>: > Author: ivan > Date: Mon Apr 20 16:19:49 2026 > New Revision: 1933188 > > Log: > * STATUS: Vote for r1931549. Approving. > > Modified: > subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS > > Modified: subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS > > ============================================================================== > --- subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS Mon Apr 20 16:12:02 2026 > (r1933187) > +++ subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS Mon Apr 20 16:19:49 2026 > (r1933188) > @@ -49,17 +49,6 @@ Candidate changes: > Votes: > +1 (not binding): brane > > - * r1931549 > - Use bytewise content comparison in the "is the file modified?" working > copy > - checks if we have the pristine file content. > - Justification: > - Avoid changing the file comparison characteristics for working > copies with > - pristine contents. > - Notes: > - Discussed in > https://lists.apache.org/thread/128rgf7ozn72ljfzn7o18gfhb9l43y26 > - Votes: > - +1: kotkov, rinrab > - > Veto-blocked changes: > ===================== > > @@ -76,3 +65,14 @@ Approved changes: > +0: hartmannathan > +1 (not binding): brane > +1: dsahlberg, rinrab, ivan > + > + * r1931549 > + Use bytewise content comparison in the "is the file modified?" working > copy > + checks if we have the pristine file content. > + Justification: > + Avoid changing the file comparison characteristics for working > copies with > + pristine contents. > + Notes: > + Discussed in > https://lists.apache.org/thread/128rgf7ozn72ljfzn7o18gfhb9l43y26 > + Votes: > + +1: kotkov, rinrab, ivan > >
