Author: hlship
Date: Sat Oct 28 10:21:51 2006
New Revision: 468706

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=468706
Log:
Fill out some details about the development process, and add some comments to 
ConcurrentBarrier.

Modified:
    
tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/tapestry/internal/util/ConcurrentBarrier.java
    tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/trunk/src/site/resources/tap5devwiki.html
    tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/trunk/src/site/resources/tap5devwiki.xml

Modified: 
tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/tapestry/internal/util/ConcurrentBarrier.java
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/tapestry/internal/util/ConcurrentBarrier.java?view=diff&rev=468706&r1=468705&r2=468706
==============================================================================
--- 
tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/tapestry/internal/util/ConcurrentBarrier.java
 (original)
+++ 
tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/tapestry/internal/util/ConcurrentBarrier.java
 Sat Oct 28 10:21:51 2006
@@ -18,7 +18,10 @@
 import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock;
 
 /**
- * A barrier used to execute code in a context where it is guarded by 
read/write locks.
+ * A barrier used to execute code in a context where it is guarded by 
read/write locks. In addition,
+ * handles upgrading read locks to write locks (and vice versa). Execution of 
code within a lock is
+ * in terms of a [EMAIL PROTECTED] Runnable} object (that returns no value), 
or a [EMAIL PROTECTED] Invokable} object
+ * (which does return a value).
  */
 public class ConcurrentBarrier
 {
@@ -49,7 +52,9 @@
      * the lock has already been acquired, then the status of the lock is not 
changed.
      * <p>
      * TODO: Check to see if the write lock is acquired and <em>not</em> 
acquire the read lock in
-     * that situation.
+     * that situation. Currently this code is not re-entrant. If a write lock 
is already acquired
+     * and the thread attempts to get the read lock, then the thread will 
hang. For the moment, all
+     * the uses of ConcurrentBarrier are coded in such a way that reentrant 
locks are not a problem.
      * 
      * @param <T>
      * @param invokable
@@ -81,6 +86,10 @@
         }
     }
 
+    /**
+     * As with [EMAIL PROTECTED] #withRead(Invokable)}, creating an [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] Invokable} wrapper around the
+     * runnable object.
+     */
     public void withRead(final Runnable runnable)
     {
         Invokable<Void> invokable = new Invokable<Void>()
@@ -97,9 +106,16 @@
     }
 
     /**
-     * Acquires the single write lock before invoking the Invokable. If the 
current thread has a
-     * read lock, it is released before attempting to acquire the write lock, 
and re-acquired after
-     * the write lock is released.
+     * Acquires the exclusive write lock before invoking the Invokable. The 
code will be executed
+     * exclusively, no other reader or writer threads will exist (they will be 
blocked waiting for
+     * the lock). If the current thread has a read lock, it is released before 
attempting to acquire
+     * the write lock, and re-acquired after the write lock is released. Note 
that in that short
+     * window, between releasing the read lock and acquiring the write lock, 
it is entirely possible
+     * that some other thread will sneak in and do some work, so the [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] Invokable} object should
+     * be prepared for cases where the state has changed slightly, despite 
holding the read lock.
+     * This usually manifests as race conditions where either a) some parallel 
unrelated bit of work
+     * has occured or b) duplicate work has occured. The latter is only 
problematic if the operation
+     * is very expensive.
      * 
      * @param <T>
      * @param invokable
@@ -138,6 +154,10 @@
         }
     }
 
+    /**
+     * As with [EMAIL PROTECTED] #withWrite(Invokable)}, creating an [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] Invokable} wrapper around the
+     * runnable object.
+     */
     public void withWrite(final Runnable runnable)
     {
         Invokable<Void> invokable = new Invokable<Void>()

Modified: 
tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/trunk/src/site/resources/tap5devwiki.html
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/trunk/src/site/resources/tap5devwiki.html?view=diff&rev=468706&r1=468705&r2=468706
==============================================================================
--- tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/trunk/src/site/resources/tap5devwiki.html 
(original)
+++ tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/trunk/src/site/resources/tap5devwiki.html 
Sat Oct 28 10:21:51 2006
@@ -5169,6 +5169,7 @@
 <div tiddler="ComponentEvent" modifier="HowardLewisShip" 
modified="200610081359" created="200610081351" tags="requests events">Component 
events represent the way in which incoming requests are routed to user-supplied 
Java methods.\n\nComponent events //primarily// originate as a result of a 
ComponentActionRequest, though certain other LifecycleEvents will also 
originate component events.\n\nEach component event contains:\n* An event type; 
a string that identifies the type of event\n* An event source; a component that 
orginates the event (where applicable)\n* A context; an array of strings 
associated with the event\n\nEvent processing starts with the component that 
originates the event.\n\nHandler methods for the event within the component are 
invoked.\n\nIf no handler method aborts the event, then handlers for the 
originating component's container are invoked.\n\nThis containues until 
handlers for the page (the root component) are invoked, or until some handler 
method aborts
  the event.\n\nThe event is aborted when a handler method returns a non-null, 
non-void value.  The interpretation of that value varies based on the type of 
event.\n\nEvents are routed to handler methods using the @~OnEvent 
annotation.\n\nThis annotation is attached to a method within a component 
class.  This method becomes a handler method for an event.\n\nThe annotation 
allows events to be filtered by event type or by originating 
component.\n\n{{{\n  @OnEvent(value=&quot;submit&quot;, 
component=&quot;form&quot;)\n  String handleSubmit()\n  {\n    // . . .\n\n   
return &quot;PostSubmit&quot;;\n  }\n}}}\n\nIn the above hypothetical example, 
a handler method is attached to a particular component's submit event.  After 
processing the data in the form, the LogicalPageName of another page within the 
application is returned. The client browser will be redirected to that 
page.\n\nHandler methods need not be public; they are most often package 
private (which facilitated UnitTesting 
 of the component class).\n\nHandler methods may take parameters.  This is most 
useful with handler methods related to links, rather than forms.\n\nAssociated 
with each event is the context, a set of strings defined by the application 
programmer.\n\nParameters are coerced (see TypeCoercion) from these strings.  
Alternately, a parameter of type String[] receives the set of strings.\n\n{{{\n 
 @OnEvent(component=&quot;delete&quot;)\n  String deleteAccount(long 
accountId)\n  {\n    // . . .\n\n   return &quot;AccountPage&quot;;\n  
}\n}}}\n\nHere, ther first context value has been coerced to a long and passed 
to the deleteAccount() method. Presemuable, an action link on the page, named 
&quot;delete&quot;, is the source of this event.\n\n</div>
 <div tiddler="ComponentMixins" modifier="HowardLewisShip" 
modified="200610051243" created="200610051234" tags="mixins">One of the more 
exciting ideas in Tapestry 5 is //mixins//; the ability to add behavior to a 
component without writing code. \n\nIt is expected that much common behavior, 
especially for form control components, will be provided by mixins. Further, 
many Ajax techniques will take the form of mixins applied to otherwise ordinary 
components.\n\nA mixin is an additional component class that operates //with// 
the main component. For a component element within the page, the functionality 
is provided by the main component class and by\nthe mixin.  \n\nMixins are 
primarily about rendering. Mixin render methods are //mixed in// to the 
components' render methods. In effect, the different rendering phases of a 
component are different AOP-like //joinpoints//, and the mixins can provide 
//before advice//.\n\nMixins can be specified for an //instance// of a 
component, or c
 an be specified as part of the //implementation// of a component.\n\nIn the 
former case, the @Component annotation will be supplemented with a @Mixin 
annotation. The @Mixin is a list of one or more mixin classes for that 
component.\n\n''Todo: Template syntax for mixins?''\n\nIn the latter case, the 
@ComponentClass annotation will be supplemented with a @Mixin 
annotation.\n\nMixins can be configured.  They can have parameters, just like 
ordinary components. When a formal parameter name is ambiguous, it will be 
prefixed with the unqualified class name. Thus, you might have to say, 
&quot;MyMixin.parameterName=someProperty&quot; if &quot;parameterName&quot; is 
ambiguous (by ambiguous, we mean, a parameter of more than one mixin or of the 
component itself).  \n\nThis disambiguation is //simple//. It is assumed that 
the unqualified class name will be sufficient to uniquely identify a mixin. 
That is, it is expected that you will not have the same class name even in 
different packag
 es (as mixins, on a single component). In a //degenerate case// where this is 
not so, it will be necessary to disambiguate the mixin name by create a 
subclass of the mixin with a new name.\n\n''Todo: how are mixins on a component 
implementation configured?''\n\nMixins may have persistent state, just as with 
ordinary components.\n\n</div>
 <div tiddler="ComponentTemplates" modifier="HowardLewisShip" 
modified="200610201807" created="200610201801" tags="">There are some issues 
related to component templates.\n\nFirstly, people are really interested in 
seeing the return of InvisibleInstrumentation.  That is coming.\n\nSecondly, 
the idea that templates are well-formed XML documents is causing some 
issues.\n\nThe problem is related to entities and doctypes.\n\nUnless you 
provide a doctype for the template, 
[[entities|http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/html40/entities/]] don't work; 
they result in template parse errors.\n\nIf you provide a standard doctype, 
say\n{{{\n &lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 
Transitional//EN&quot;\n            
&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd&quot;&gt;\n}}}\n\nYou also get 
parse errors, because the DTD does some odd things with comments that the Java 
SAX parser doesn't seem to understand.\n\nI've had better luck with the XHTML 
doctype:\n{{{\n&lt;!DOCTYPE htm
 l PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 
Transitional//EN&quot;\n&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd&quot;&gt;\n}}}\n\nBut
 this doesn't render quite the way I want it to.\n\nFurther, entities in the 
text are converted to unicode by the parser, then converted to &lt;numeric&gt; 
entities on output.  Not quite WYSIWYG and potentially confusing.\n\nIt may be 
necessary to discard SAX and build a limited XML parser that allows entities to 
be passed through unchanged (they would become a special type of document 
token).\n\nLastly, the question is how to get the correct DOCTYPE into the 
rendered output, espcially in the common case that a Border component provides 
the outer tags, as is common in Tapestry 4.  This may have to be configured as 
a annotation on page classes.</div>
+<div tiddler="DeveloperProcedures" modifier="HowardLewisShip" 
modified="200610281525" created="200610281524" tags="">Tapestry is a big chunk 
of code, growing every day. We need to not step on each other's toes.\n\n//At 
this time, Tapestry is pretty single threaded, with Howard setting up the main 
infrastructure.  Soon there's going to be a crowd of folks working on it, and 
we need to coordinate on this ahead of time.//\n\nBasic guidelines:\n\n* 
WorkInYourOwnBranch\n* WatchCodeCoverage\n* FocusOnTesting\n* 
DontTouchInternals\n</div>
 <div tiddler="DynamicPageState" modifier="HowardLewisShip" 
modified="200609211635" created="200609211610" tags="">Tapestry 4 has left 
tracking of dynamic page state as an exercise to the developer.  Mostly, this 
is done using the ''parameters'' parameter of the ~DirectLink 
component.\n\nDynamic page state is anything that isn't inside a persistent 
page property. For the most part, this includes page properties updated by a 
For component\n\nIt seems likely that this information could be automatically 
encoded into ~URLs.  \n\nI'm envisioning a service that accumulates a series of 
//commands//. Each command is used to store a bit of page state. The commands 
are serializable.  The commands are ultimately serialized into a MIME string 
and attached as a query parameter to each URL.\n\nWhen such a link is 
triggered, the commands are de-serialized and each executed in turn. Only when 
that is finished is any further event processing executed, including calling 
into to user code.\n\nM
 y outline for this is to store a series of tuples; each tuple is a component 
id plus the command to execute.\n\n{{{\npublic interface 
ComponentCommand&lt;T&gt;\n{\n  void execute(T component);\n}\n}}}\n\nThese 
commands should be immutable.\n\nSo a component, such as a For loop component, 
could provide itself and a ComponentCommand instance (probably a static inner 
class) to some kind of PageStateTracker service.\n\n{{{\npublic interface 
PageStateTracker\n{\n  void &lt;T&gt; addCommand(T component, 
ComponentCommand&lt;T&gt; command);\n}\n}}}\n\nThe commands are kept in the 
order that they are added, except that new commands for the same component 
//replace// previous commands for that component.\n\nAs with the Tapestry 4 For 
component, some mechanism will be needed to store object ids inside the URLs 
(that is, inside the commands serialized into URL query parameters) and 
translate back to //equivalent// objects when the link is triggered.\n\nDynamic 
page state outside of a Fo
 rm will overlap with some of the FormProcessing inside the form.</div>
 <div tiddler="EditTemplate" modifier="HowardLewisShip" modified="200609210649" 
created="200609210648" tags="">&lt;div class='toolbar' macro='toolbar 
+saveTiddler -cancelTiddler deleteTiddler'&gt;&lt;/div&gt;\n&lt;div 
class='title' macro='view title'&gt;&lt;/div&gt;\n&lt;div class='editor' 
macro='edit title'&gt;&lt;/div&gt;\n&lt;div class='editor' macro='edit 
text'&gt;&lt;/div&gt;\n&lt;div class='editor' macro='edit 
tags'&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class='editorFooter'&gt;&lt;span macro='message 
views.editor.tagPrompt'&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span 
macro='tagChooser'&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</div>
 <div tiddler="EnvironmentalServices" modifier="HowardLewisShip" 
modified="200609260145" created="200609251547" tags="">Frequently, different 
components need to //cooperate// during the rendering process.\n\nThis is an 
established pattern from Tapestry 4, which an enclosing component provides 
services to the components it encloses. By //encloses// we mean, any components 
that are rendered as part of the Form's body; give the use of the 
Block/~RenderBlock components, this can not be determined statically, but is 
instead determined dynamically, as part of the rendering process.\n\nThe 
canoncial example of this pattern is Form component, and the complex 
relationship it has with each form element component it encloses.\n\nIn 
Tapestry 4, this mechanism was based on the ~IRequestCycle which could store 
named attributes. The service providing component would store itself into the 
cycle using a well known name, and service consuming components would retrieve 
the service using the sam
 e well known name.\n\nFor Tapestry 5, this will be formalized. A new service 
will be used to manage this information:\n\n{{{\npublic interface 
Enviroment\n{\n  &lt;T&gt; T push(Class&lt;T&gt; type, T instance);\n\n  
&lt;T&gt; peek(Class&lt;T&gt; type);\n\n  &lt;T&gt; T pop(Class&lt;T&gt; 
type);\n}\n}}}\n\nThe Environment is unique to a request.</div>
@@ -5176,7 +5177,7 @@
 <div tiddler="InvisibleInstrumentation" modifier="HowardLewisShip" 
modified="200610201803" created="200610201802" tags="">A feature of Tapestry 4 
where the component id, type and parameters were &quot;hidden&quot; inside 
ordinary HTML tags.\n\nThis will show up inside Tapestry 5 pretty soon, and 
look something like:\n{{{\n&lt;span t:type=&quot;If&quot; 
t:test=&quot;prop:showWarning&quot; class=&quot;warning&quot;&gt; \n  . . 
.\n&lt;/span&gt;\n}}}</div>
 <div tiddler="LogicalPageName" modifier="HowardLewisShip" 
modified="200610081330" created="200610081330" tags="">A logical page name is 
the name of a page as it is represented in a URI.\n\nInternally, Tapestry 
operates on pages using full qualified class names. Technically, the FQCN is 
the class of the page's root element, but from an end developer point of view, 
the root element is the page.\n\nThe logical page name must be converted to a 
fully qualified class name.\n\nA set of LibraryMappings are used.  Each library 
mapping is used to express a folder name, such as &quot;core&quot;, with a Java 
package name, such as org.apache.tapestry.corelib.  For pages, the page name is 
searched for in the pages sub-package (i.e., 
org.apache.tapestry.corelib.pages).  Component libraries have unique folder 
names mapped to root packages that contain the pages (and components, and 
mixins) of that library.\n\nWhen there is no folder name, the page is expected 
to be part of the application, 
 under the pages sub-package of the application's root package.\n\nIf not found 
there, as a special case, the name is treated as if it were prefixed with 
&quot;core/&quot;.  This allows access to the core pages (and more importantly, 
components -- the search algorithm is the same).\n\nFinally, pages may be 
organized into folders.  These folders become further sub-packages. Thus as 
page name of &quot;admin/EditUsers&quot; may be resolved to class 
org.example.myapp.pages.admin.EditUsers.\n\n</div>
 <div tiddler="MainMenu" modifier="HowardLewisShip" modified="200609210701" 
created="200609210643" tags="">MasterIndex\n[[RSS 
feed|tap5devwiki.xml]]\n\n[[Tapestry 5 
Home|http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/]]\n[[Howard's 
Blog|http://howardlewisship.com/blog/]]\n\n[[Formatting 
Help|http://www.blogjones.com/TiddlyWikiTutorial.html#EasyToEdit%20Welcome%20NewFeatures%20WhereToFindHelp]]</div>
-<div tiddler="MasterIndex" modifier="HowardLewisShip" modified="200610201757" 
created="200609202214" tags="">Top level concepts within Tapestry 5.\n\n* 
PropBinding -- Notes on the workhorse &quot;prop:&quot; binding prefix\n* 
TypeCoercion -- How Tapestry 5 extensibly addresses type conversion\n* 
FormProcessing\n* DynamicPageState -- tracking changes to page state during the 
render\n* EnvironmentalServices -- how components cooperate during page 
render\n* ComponentMixins -- A new fundamental way to build web 
functionality\n* RequestTypes -- Requests, request processing, URL formats\n* 
ComponentTemplates -- Issues about Component Templates</div>
+<div tiddler="MasterIndex" modifier="HowardLewisShip" modified="200610281524" 
created="200609202214" tags="">Top level concepts within Tapestry 5.\n\nA 
//meta-note//: This is where new ideas are first explained, usually before 
being implemented. In many cases, the final implementation is\nnot a perfect 
match for the notes. That's OK ... as long as the official Maven documentation 
does a good job. It's not reasonable to expect developers to jump back in here 
and dot every i and cross every t if they're already expected to generate good 
Maven documentation.\n\n* PropBinding -- Notes on the workhorse 
&quot;prop:&quot; binding prefix\n* TypeCoercion -- How Tapestry 5 extensibly 
addresses type conversion\n* FormProcessing\n* DynamicPageState -- tracking 
changes to page state during the render\n* EnvironmentalServices -- how 
components cooperate during page render\n* ComponentMixins -- A new fundamental 
way to build web functionality\n* RequestTypes -- Requests, request processing
 , URL formats\n* ComponentTemplates -- Issues about Component Templates\n* 
DeveloperProcedures -- Your a Tapestry committer ... how do you makes 
changes?</div>
 <div tiddler="OGNL" modifier="HowardLewisShip" modified="200610071249" 
created="200609202254" tags="">The [[Object Graph Navigation 
Library|http://ognl.org]] was an essential part of Tapestry 4.\n\nOGNL is both 
exceptionally powerful (especially the higher order things it can do, such as 
list selections and projections). However, for the highest\nend sites, it is 
also a performance problem, both because of its heavy use of reflection, and 
because it uses a lot of code inside synchronized blocks.\n\nIt will be 
optional in Tapestry 5. I believe it will not be part of the tapestry-core, but 
may be packaged as tapestry-ognl.\n\nThe &quot;prop:&quot; binding prefix is an 
effective replacement for OGNL in Tapestry 5.   See PropBinding.\n</div>
 <div tiddler="PageRenderRequest" modifier="HowardLewisShip" 
modified="200610081333" created="200610071313" tags="">Page render requests are 
requests used to render a specific page.  //render// is the term meaning to 
compose the HTML response to be sent to the client. Note: HTML is used here 
only as the most common case, other markups are entirely possible.\n\nIn many 
cases, pages are stand-alone.  No extra information in the URL is necesarry to 
render them.  PersistentProperties of the page will factor in to the rendering 
of the page.\n\nIn specific cases, a page needs to render within a particular 
context. The most common example of this is a page that is used to present a 
specific instance of a database persistent entity. In such a case, the page 
must be combined with additional data, in the URL, to identify the specific 
entity to access and render.\n\n! URI 
Format\n\n{{{\n/page-name.html/id\n}}}\n\nHere &quot;page-name&quot; is the 
LogicalPageName for the page. \n\nThe &q
 uot;.html&quot; file extension is used as a delimiter between the page name 
portion of the URI, and the context portion of the URI. This is necessary 
because it is not possible (given the plethora of libraries and folders) to 
determine how many slashes will appear in the URI.\n\nThe context consists of 
one ore more ids (though a single id is the normal case). The id is used to 
identify the specific data to be displayed. Further, a page may require 
multiple ids, which will separated with slashes. Example: 
/admin/DisplayDetail.html/loginfailures/2006\n\nNote that these context values, 
the ids, are simply //strings//. Tapestry 4 had a mechanism, the DataSqueezer, 
that would encode the type of object with its value, as a single string, and 
convert it back. While seemingly desirable, this facility was easy to abuse, 
resulting in long and extremely ugly URIs.\n\nAny further information needed by 
Tapestry will be added to the URI as query parameters. This may include things 
like us
 er locale, persistent page properties, applicaition flow identifiers, or 
anything else we come up with.\n\n! Request Processing\n\nOnce the page and id 
parameters are identified, the corresponding page will be loaded.\n\nTapestry 
will fire two events before rendering the page.\n\nThe first event is of type 
&quot;setupPageRender&quot;.  This allows the page to process the context (the 
set of ids). This typically involves reading objects from an external 
persistent store (a database)\nand storing those objects into transient page 
properties, in expectaion of the render.\n\nThe @SetupPageRender annotation 
marks a method to be invoked when this event is triggered.  The method may take 
one or more strings, or an array of strings, as parameters; these will be\nthe 
context values.  The method will normally return void.  Other values are 
''TBD''. It may also take other simple types, which will be coerced from the 
string [EMAIL PROTECTED] setup(long id)\n{\n  . .
  .\n}\n}}}\n\n\n\nThe second event is of type &quot;pageValidate&quot;.  It 
allows the page to decide whether the page is valid for rendering at this time. 
This most often involves a check to see if the user is logged into the 
application, and has the necessary privileges to display the contents of the 
page.  User identity and privileges are //not// concepts built into Tapestry, 
but are fundamental to the majority of Tapestry applications.</div>
 <div tiddler="PropBinding" modifier="HowardLewisShip" modified="200610201450" 
created="200609202203" tags="bindings">The &quot;prop:&quot; binding prefix is 
the default in a  lot of cases, i.e., in any Java code (annotations).\n\nThis 
binding prefix  supports several common idioms even though they are not, 
precisely, the names of properties.  In many cases, this will save developers 
the bother of using a &quot;literal:&quot; prefix.\n\nThe goal of the 
&quot;prop:&quot; prefix is to be highly efficient and useful in 90%+ of the 
cases. [[OGNL]], or synthetic properties in the component class, will pick up 
the remaining cases.\n\n!Numeric literals\n\nSimple numeric literals should be 
parsed into read-only, invariant 
bindings.\n{{{\nprop:5\n\nprop:-22.7\n}}}\n\nThe resulting objects will be of 
type Long or type Double. TypeCoercion will ensure that component parameters 
get values (say, int or float) of the correct type.\n\n!Range 
literals\n\nExpresses a range of integer values, 
 either ascending or descending.\n{{{\nprop:1..10\n\nprop:100..-100\n}}}\n\nThe 
value of such a binding is Iterable; it can be used by the Loop 
component.\n\n!Boolean literals\n\n&quot;true&quot; and &quot;false&quot; 
should also be converted to invariant 
bindings.\n{{{\nprop:true\n\nprop:false\n}}}\n\n!String literals\n\n//Simple// 
string literals, enclosed in single quotes.  Example:\n{{{\nprop:'Hello 
World'\n}}}\n\n//Remember that the binding expression will always be enclosed 
in double quotes.//\n\n!This literal\n\nIn some cases, it is useful to be able 
to identify the current component:\n{{{\nprop:this\n}}}\n\nEven though a 
component is not immutable, the value of //this// does not ever change,\nand 
this binding is also invariant.\n\n!Null literal\n\n{{{\nprop:null\n}}}\n\nThis 
value is always exactly null. This can be used to set a parameter who'se 
default value is non-null to the explicit value null.\n\n!Property 
paths\n\nMulti-step property paths are extremely importa
 nt.\n\n{{{\nprop:poll.title\n\nprop:identity.user.name\n}}}\n\nThe initial 
terms need to be readable, they are never updated. Only the final property name 
must be read/write, and in fact, it is valid to be read-only or 
write-only.\n\nThe prop: binding factory builds a Java expression to read and 
update properties. It does not use reflection at runtime. Therefore, the 
properties of the //declared// type are used. By contrast, [[OGNL]] uses the 
//actual// type, which is reflection-intensive. Also, unlike OGNL, errors (such 
as missing properties in the property path) are identified when the page is 
loaded, rather than when the expression is evaluated.\n</div>
@@ -5187,6 +5188,7 @@
 <div tiddler="SiteUrl" modifier="HowardLewisShip" modified="200609210703" 
created="200609210641" 
tags="">http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tap5devwiki.html</div>
 <div tiddler="TabAll" modifier="HowardLewisShip" modified="200609210650" 
created="200609210650" tags="">&lt;&lt;list all&gt;&gt;</div>
 <div tiddler="TypeCoercion" modifier="HowardLewisShip" modified="200610051240" 
created="200609202217" tags="parameters types">Automatic coercion of types is 
essential.  This primarily applies to component parameters.\n\nParameters are 
tied to the 
[[Binding|http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry/Binding.html]]
 interface.\n\nTapestry component parameters look like simple instance 
variables, but Tapestry's RuntimeTransformation of component classes means that 
reading the value of a parameter instance variable //may// invoke 
Binding.get(), and changing the value of a parameter instance variable will 
invoke Binding.set().\n\n!Reading From Parameters\n\nReading a parameter value 
involves two steps:\n* Invoking Binding.get()\n* Converting the result to the 
type of the parameter (where different)\n\nWhen reading parameters, the binding 
will provide an object of the type of the bound property.  Various kinds of 
invariant bindings will returned a fixed type, 
 typically a String.\n\nThe parameter will be assigned to a variable that has a 
known type, possibly a primtive type (int, boolean) or an object type (Map, 
Date).\n\n!Writing To Parameters\n\nWriting to, or updating, a parameter is in 
two steps:\n* Converting the new value into a type appropriate for the 
binding\n* Invoking Binding.set()\n\nWe will be adding a getPropertyType() 
method to the Binding interface, that will identify the property type of the 
property bound to the parameter.\n\nThe component will be responsible for 
performing a coercion from the value provided to the proper type, before 
invoking Binding.set().\n\n!Coercion Tuples\n\nAt the core of this will be a 
service that performs type coercions.\n\nCoercions are based on //coercion 
tuples// that define:\n* A source type\n* A target type\n* An object to perform 
the coercion from source to target\n* A &quot;cost&quot; for the conversion 
(possibly, but usually with a standard default value) ''(not yet implemented)
 ''\n\nAs a special case, the type of null will be treated as type void (i.e., 
void.class).  Thus we can use the same mechanism to identify how to convert 
from null to other types, such as Boolean or Integer.\n\nThere should be a 
large number of these tuples available.  The most common tuples may be 
conversions between various types and String.\n\n!Coercion Algorithm\n* 
Determine the source type (treating null as void.class)\n* Determine the target 
type (converting primitive types to equivalent wrapper types)\n* If the source 
type is assignable to the target type, then the input value is valid and the 
process is complete\n* Find a converter that converts between the source type 
and the target type, pass the source value through the converter to get a 
target value\n\nThat last part needs a bit of expansion.\n\nFirst off, there 
will often ''not'' be a tuple for coercing directly form the source type to the 
target type.\n\nIn that scenario, the conversion will involve a search  
 to find a sequence of tuples that will perform the coercion.  This will take 
the form a breadth-first search where we look for tuples that coerce from the 
source type to an intermediate type, then search for tuples from the 
intermediate type to the target type.  This may involve more than two 
coercions.\n\nYou can think of the set of tuples as a kind of directed graph.  
Each type is a node on the graph, and each tuple represents a connection 
between one type and another type (say, from String to Double).  What we're 
trying to do is find a path form a source type (or some super-class or 
super-interface of the source type) to some target type (or sub-class or 
sub-interface of the target type).\n\nMay need to express a &quot;cost&quot; of 
the coercion from start type to target type; this might be useful if there are 
multiple paths for the conversion. Cost may factor in both the computing 
expense, and any loss of detail.  Basic cost is established in terms of the 
number of steps
  and enforced by the order in which tuples are considered and combined.\n\nFor 
example, a coercion tuple from Number to Float may be represented as the 
tuple:\n(Number, Float, {{{ return new Float(input.floatValue()); 
}}})\n\n{{{\npublic interface Coercion&lt;S,T&gt;\n{\n  T coerce(S 
input);\n}\n}}}\n\nIf the input type is an Integer, then a search for 
Integer-&gt;Float will find no entries. At that point, it will be necessary to 
&quot;climb&quot; the inheritance tree and look for coercions from Number (the 
super class of Integer); this will find the Number-&gt;Float tuple.\n\nAgain, 
in terms of cost, we might also find a pair of tuples:  Object-&gt;String and 
String-&gt;Float.  This will have a higher cost than the Number-&gt;Float tuple 
and should be rejected in favor of the lower cost coercion.\n\n//Note: cost 
hasn't been implemented, and likely won't be, unless and until the algorithm as 
it stands is shown to provide less than optimal results.//\n\nThe algorithm 
caches t
 he result of this search, with proper guards for concurrent access. The cache 
is cleared when an invalidation of the component class loader 
occurs.\n\n!Configuring the service\n\nThis has been implemented as service 
tapestry.TypeCoercer.\n\nThe configuration of this service is an unordered 
collection of CoercionTuple.</div>
+<div tiddler="WorkInYourOwnBranch" modifier="HowardLewisShip" 
modified="200610281536" created="200610281528" tags="">Working in the trunk can 
be a problem. ''The SVN trunk is where merges happen, not where development 
happens.''\n\nFor any bit of code change you make, you want to do the 
following:\n\n* Branch trunk to form your own sandbox\n* Work in the sandbox\n* 
Ensure high quality: high code coverage, unit and integration tests, up-to-date 
documentation\n* Announce (on the developer mailing list) that you are 
committing to trunk\n* Switch your workspace back to trunk\n* Tag trunk as 
premerge\n* Merge from your sandbox\n* Ensure a good merge (including 
documentation, tests, and code coverage)\n* Commit your merge to trunk\n* Tag 
trunk as postmerge\n\n!Branch names\n\nBranch names should consist of your user 
id, the current date as YYYYMMDD, and a short mneumonic, such as a bug id.  
Example:  {{{hlship-20061027-removeaspectj}}}.\n\nThere's a branches folder for 
tapestry5/t
 apestry-core, i.e. 
[http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/branches/]\n\n!Tag
 names\n\nPrefix the branch name with &quot;premerge&quot; or 
&quot;postmerge&quot;.  i.e. 
[http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/tags/]\n\nThese 
are really important when trying to back out a change, the pre and the post 
give a lot of context to see what actually changed.\n\n!Announcing\n\nMerging 
is hard enough, it's worse if two people are making possibly conflicting 
changes at the same time. A little coordination goes a long way.\n\n!Small 
increments are ''Good''\n\nThis looks like a lot of overhead, but thanks to 
Subversion, it really isn't. It's still better to do small increments of work. 
Don't go away for six months and expect an easy job of committing changes. You 
can do this style of work several times a day (Subversion was created 
specifically to make tagging, branching, and merging fast).</div>
                </div>
 <!--POST-BODY-START-->
 

Modified: 
tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/trunk/src/site/resources/tap5devwiki.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/trunk/src/site/resources/tap5devwiki.xml?view=diff&rev=468706&r1=468705&r2=468706
==============================================================================
--- tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/trunk/src/site/resources/tap5devwiki.xml 
(original)
+++ tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/trunk/src/site/resources/tap5devwiki.xml 
Sat Oct 28 10:21:51 2006
@@ -6,27 +6,39 @@
 <description>The quick and dirty one-stop shopping of random ideas for 
Tapestry 5.</description>
 <language>en-us</language>
 <copyright>Copyright 2006 HowardLewisShip</copyright>
-<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:07:34 GMT</pubDate>
-<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:07:34 GMT</lastBuildDate>
+<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:36:05 GMT</pubDate>
+<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:36:05 GMT</lastBuildDate>
 <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
 <generator>TiddlyWiki 2.0.11</generator>
 <item>
+<title>WorkInYourOwnBranch</title>
+<description>Working in the trunk can be a problem. ''The SVN trunk is where 
merges happen, not where development happens.''&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For any 
bit of code change you make, you want to do the following:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br 
/&gt;* Branch trunk to form your own sandbox&lt;br /&gt;* Work in the 
sandbox&lt;br /&gt;* Ensure high quality: high code coverage, unit and 
integration tests, up-to-date documentation&lt;br /&gt;* Announce (on the 
developer mailing list) that you are committing to trunk&lt;br /&gt;* Switch 
your workspace back to trunk&lt;br /&gt;* Tag trunk as premerge&lt;br /&gt;* 
Merge from your sandbox&lt;br /&gt;* Ensure a good merge (including 
documentation, tests, and code coverage)&lt;br /&gt;* Commit your merge to 
trunk&lt;br /&gt;* Tag trunk as postmerge&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;!Branch 
names&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Branch names should consist of your user id, the 
current date as YYYYMMDD, and a short mneumonic, such as a bug id.  Example:  
{{{hlship-20061
 027-removeaspectj}}}.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There's a branches folder for 
tapestry5/tapestry-core, i.e. 
[http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/branches/]&lt;br 
/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;!Tag names&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Prefix the branch name with 
&quot;premerge&quot; or &quot;postmerge&quot;.  i.e. 
[http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/tags/]&lt;br 
/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These are really important when trying to back out a change, 
the pre and the post give a lot of context to see what actually changed.&lt;br 
/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;!Announcing&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Merging is hard enough, 
it's worse if two people are making possibly conflicting changes at the same 
time. A little coordination goes a long way.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;!Small 
increments are ''Good''&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This looks like a lot of 
overhead, but thanks to Subversion, it really isn't. It's still better to do 
small increments of work. Don't go away for six months and exp
 ect an easy job of committing changes. You can do this style of work several 
times a day (Subversion was created specifically to make tagging, branching, 
and merging fast).</description>
+<link>http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tap5devwiki.html#WorkInYourOwnBranch</link>
+<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:36:05 GMT</pubDate>
+</item>
+<item>
+<title>DeveloperProcedures</title>
+<description>Tapestry is a big chunk of code, growing every day. We need to 
not step on each other's toes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;//At this time, Tapestry 
is pretty single threaded, with Howard setting up the main infrastructure.  
Soon there's going to be a crowd of folks working on it, and we need to 
coordinate on this ahead of time.//&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Basic 
guidelines:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* WorkInYourOwnBranch&lt;br /&gt;* 
WatchCodeCoverage&lt;br /&gt;* FocusOnTesting&lt;br /&gt;* 
DontTouchInternals&lt;br /&gt;</description>
+<link>http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tap5devwiki.html#DeveloperProcedures</link>
+<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:25:11 GMT</pubDate>
+</item>
+<item>
+<title>MasterIndex</title>
+<description>Top level concepts within Tapestry 5.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A 
//meta-note//: This is where new ideas are first explained, usually before 
being implemented. In many cases, the final implementation is&lt;br /&gt;not a 
perfect match for the notes. That's OK ... as long as the official Maven 
documentation does a good job. It's not reasonable to expect developers to jump 
back in here and dot every i and cross every t if they're already expected to 
generate good Maven documentation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* PropBinding -- 
Notes on the workhorse &quot;prop:&quot; binding prefix&lt;br /&gt;* 
TypeCoercion -- How Tapestry 5 extensibly addresses type conversion&lt;br 
/&gt;* FormProcessing&lt;br /&gt;* DynamicPageState -- tracking changes to page 
state during the render&lt;br /&gt;* EnvironmentalServices -- how components 
cooperate during page render&lt;br /&gt;* ComponentMixins -- A new fundamental 
way to build web functionality&lt;br /&gt;* RequestTypes -- Requests, requ
 est processing, URL formats&lt;br /&gt;* ComponentTemplates -- Issues about 
Component Templates&lt;br /&gt;* DeveloperProcedures -- Your a Tapestry 
committer ... how do you makes changes?</description>
+<link>http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tap5devwiki.html#MasterIndex</link>
+<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:24:18 GMT</pubDate>
+</item>
+<item>
 <title>ComponentTemplates</title>
 <description>There are some issues related to component templates.&lt;br 
/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Firstly, people are really interested in seeing the return of 
InvisibleInstrumentation.  That is coming.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Secondly, the 
idea that templates are well-formed XML documents is causing some issues.&lt;br 
/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The problem is related to entities and doctypes.&lt;br 
/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Unless you provide a doctype for the template, 
[[entities|http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/html40/entities/]] don't work; 
they result in template parse errors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you provide a 
standard doctype, say&lt;br /&gt;{{{&lt;br /&gt; &lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC 
&quot;-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN&quot;&lt;br /&gt;            
&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;}}}&lt;br 
/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You also get parse errors, because the DTD does some odd 
things with comments that the Java SAX parser doesn't seem to understand.&lt;br 
/&gt;&l
 t;br /&gt;I've had better luck with the XHTML doctype:&lt;br /&gt;{{{&lt;br 
/&gt;&lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 
Transitional//EN&quot;&lt;br 
/&gt;&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd&quot;&gt;&lt;br
 /&gt;}}}&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But this doesn't render quite the way I want 
it to.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Further, entities in the text are converted to 
unicode by the parser, then converted to &lt;numeric&gt; entities on output.  
Not quite WYSIWYG and potentially confusing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It may be 
necessary to discard SAX and build a limited XML parser that allows entities to 
be passed through unchanged (they would become a special type of document 
token).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lastly, the question is how to get the correct 
DOCTYPE into the rendered output, espcially in the common case that a Border 
component provides the outer tags, as is common in Tapestry 4.  This may have 
to be configured as a annotation on page class
 es.</description>
 
<link>http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tap5devwiki.html#ComponentTemplates</link>
-<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:07:34 GMT</pubDate>
+<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
 <title>InvisibleInstrumentation</title>
 <description>A feature of Tapestry 4 where the component id, type and 
parameters were &quot;hidden&quot; inside ordinary HTML tags.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br 
/&gt;This will show up inside Tapestry 5 pretty soon, and look something 
like:&lt;br /&gt;{{{&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span t:type=&quot;If&quot; 
t:test=&quot;prop:showWarning&quot; class=&quot;warning&quot;&gt; &lt;br /&gt;  
. . .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;}}}</description>
 
<link>http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tap5devwiki.html#InvisibleInstrumentation</link>
-<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:03:21 GMT</pubDate>
-</item>
-<item>
-<title>MasterIndex</title>
-<description>Top level concepts within Tapestry 5.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* 
PropBinding -- Notes on the workhorse &quot;prop:&quot; binding prefix&lt;br 
/&gt;* TypeCoercion -- How Tapestry 5 extensibly addresses type 
conversion&lt;br /&gt;* FormProcessing&lt;br /&gt;* DynamicPageState -- 
tracking changes to page state during the render&lt;br /&gt;* 
EnvironmentalServices -- how components cooperate during page render&lt;br 
/&gt;* ComponentMixins -- A new fundamental way to build web 
functionality&lt;br /&gt;* RequestTypes -- Requests, request processing, URL 
formats&lt;br /&gt;* ComponentTemplates -- Issues about Component 
Templates</description>
-<link>http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tap5devwiki.html#MasterIndex</link>
-<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:57:13 GMT</pubDate>
+<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
 <title>PropBinding</title>
@@ -125,18 +137,6 @@
 <description>&lt;&lt;tabs txtMainTab Timeline Timeline TabTimeline All 'All 
tiddlers' TabAll Tags 'All tags' TabTags More 'More lists' 
TabMore&gt;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description>
 <link>http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tap5devwiki.html#SideBarTabs</link>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 06:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
-</item>
-<item>
-<title>TabAll</title>
-<description>&lt;&lt;list all&gt;&gt;</description>
-<link>http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tap5devwiki.html#TabAll</link>
-<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 06:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
-</item>
-<item>
-<title>EditTemplate</title>
-<description>&lt;div class='toolbar' macro='toolbar +saveTiddler 
-cancelTiddler deleteTiddler'&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class='title' 
macro='view title'&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class='editor' 
macro='edit title'&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class='editor' 
macro='edit text'&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class='editor' macro='edit 
tags'&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class='editorFooter'&gt;&lt;span macro='message 
views.editor.tagPrompt'&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span 
macro='tagChooser'&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
-<link>http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tap5devwiki.html#EditTemplate</link>
-<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 06:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 </channel>
 </rss>


Reply via email to