messages property lookup for enum values is inconsistent, and incorrect
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: TAP5-1452
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1452
             Project: Tapestry 5
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: tapestry-core
    Affects Versions: 5.1.0.7, 5.2.4
            Reporter: Paul Stanton
            Priority: Minor


I work on a project which has a few different entities each with their own 
specific ranges of potential values for 'Category'. The way this project has 
achieved this is to inline Enums within the entity class. Unfortunately, the 
classes all define an enum named "Category", ie:

public class EntityOne
{
    enum Category {...};
    private Category category;
    ....
}

public class EntityTwo
{
    enum Category {...};
    private Category category;
    ....
}

The EnumSelectModel uses TapestryInternalUtils.getLabelForEnum(Messages 
messages, String prefix, Enum value) where prefix is enumClass.getSimpleName()

This makes it impossible to differentiate inline enums in different classes 
with the same name since EntityOne.Category and EntityTwo.Category would both 
have the prefix "Category".

After doing some further digging I also found that there was another way to 
resolve a message for an enum value: 
TapestryInternalUtils.getLabelForEnum(Messages messages, Enum value) which is 
used by PropertyDisplayBlocks. This method is slightly better since it would 
look for EntityOne$Category instead of just Category, however I think it would 
be better still to use the fully qualified name.



I think it is important to
a) be consistent 
b) allow for all cases


Here is my solution:

1. scrap TapestryInternalUtils.getLabelForEnum(Messages messages, String 
prefix, Enum value) and move the cascading logic into 
TapestryInternalUtils.getLabelForEnum(Messages messages, Enum value), update 
EnumSelectModel to use TapestryInternalUtils.getLabelForEnum(Messages messages, 
Enum value).

2. change the cascading lookup logic to
   a) test for [value.getClass().getName() + "." + value.name()]
   b) test for [lastTerm(value.getClass().getName()) + "." + value.name()]
   c) test for [value.getClass().getSimpleName() + "." + value.name()]
   d) test for [value.name()]

The code:

    public static String getLabelForEnum(Messages messages, Enum value)
    {
        String key1 = value.getClass().getName() + "." + value.name();

        if (messages.contains(key1))
            return messages.get(key1);

        String key2 = lastTerm(value.getClass().getName()) + "." + value.name();

        if (messages.contains(key2))
            return messages.get(key2);

        String key3 = value.getClass().getSimpleName() + "." + value.name();

        if (messages.contains(key3))
            return messages.get(key3);

        String key4 = value.name();

        if (messages.contains(key4))
            return messages.get(key4);

        return toUserPresentable(value.name().toLowerCase());
    }

EnumSelectModel and PropertyDisplayBlocks could use this without issue and be 
fully backwards compatible with previously defined message properties.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to