[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andy Blower updated TAP5-1563:
------------------------------

          Component/s: documentation
             Priority: Minor  (was: Major)
          Description: 
ParallelExecutor service appears to be bound to the number of executor threads 
specified by THREAD_POOL_CORE_SIZE rather than THREAD_POOL_MAX_SIZE, which 
means by default only three parallel tasks are executed at once rather than the 
maximum of 20. This is unexpected behaviour to someone not familiar with the 
ThreadPoolExecutor design, which is not intuitive. The documentation should be 
expanded to explain this correctly.

This blog post I found explains it clearly 
http://www.bigsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/11/27/rules-of-a-threadpoolexecutor-pool-size


  was:ParallelExecutor service appears to be bound to the number of executor 
threads specified by THREAD_POOL_CORE_SIZE rather than THREAD_POOL_MAX_SIZE, 
which means by default only three parallel tasks are executed at once rather 
than the maximum of 20.

           Issue Type: Improvement  (was: Bug)
    Affects Version/s:     (was: 5.2.4)

> ParallelExecutor service appears to be bound to the number of executor 
> threads specified by THREAD_POOL_CORE_SIZE 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAP5-1563
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1563
>             Project: Tapestry 5
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: documentation, tapestry-ioc
>            Reporter: Andy Blower
>            Priority: Minor
>
> ParallelExecutor service appears to be bound to the number of executor 
> threads specified by THREAD_POOL_CORE_SIZE rather than THREAD_POOL_MAX_SIZE, 
> which means by default only three parallel tasks are executed at once rather 
> than the maximum of 20. This is unexpected behaviour to someone not familiar 
> with the ThreadPoolExecutor design, which is not intuitive. The documentation 
> should be expanded to explain this correctly.
> This blog post I found explains it clearly 
> http://www.bigsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/11/27/rules-of-a-threadpoolexecutor-pool-size

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to