Author: buildbot
Date: Tue Jul 12 21:57:04 2016
New Revision: 992629

Log:
Staging update by buildbot for taverna

Modified:
    websites/staging/taverna/trunk/cgi-bin/   (props changed)
    websites/staging/taverna/trunk/content/   (props changed)
    
websites/staging/taverna/trunk/content/documentation/web-service-developers/index.html

Propchange: websites/staging/taverna/trunk/cgi-bin/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- cms:source-revision (original)
+++ cms:source-revision Tue Jul 12 21:57:04 2016
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1752351
+1752353

Propchange: websites/staging/taverna/trunk/content/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- cms:source-revision (original)
+++ cms:source-revision Tue Jul 12 21:57:04 2016
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1752351
+1752353

Modified: 
websites/staging/taverna/trunk/content/documentation/web-service-developers/index.html
==============================================================================
--- 
websites/staging/taverna/trunk/content/documentation/web-service-developers/index.html
 (original)
+++ 
websites/staging/taverna/trunk/content/documentation/web-service-developers/index.html
 Tue Jul 12 21:57:04 2016
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ options would yield 4 binding styles, ex
 is not WS-I compliant and is <a 
href="https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-whichwsdl/";>not used</a>. 
 However, there is an additional binding style that is commonly referred to as 
the 
 document/literal wrapped style. </p>
-<p>Thus, developers have four binding styles to choose from when creating a 
WSDL file.</p>
+<p>Thus, developers have 4 binding styles to choose from when creating a WSDL 
file.</p>
 <ol>
 <li>RPC/encoded</li>
 <li>RPC/literal</li>
@@ -215,22 +215,22 @@ document/literal wrapped style. </p>
 <li>Document/literal wrapped</li>
 </ol>
 <p>IBM developerWorks has a good description of the <a 
href="https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-whichwsdl/";>differences 
between these styles</a>. </p>
-<p>Although Taverna supports to a fair extent bindings that are 
<strong>RPC/encoded</strong> and <strong>RPC/literal</strong>, 
+<p>Although Taverna supports to a fair extent bindings that are 
<strong>RPC/encoded</strong> or <strong>RPC/literal</strong>, 
    the preferred binding style is <strong>document/literal wrapped</strong>. 
    Specifically, the WSDL should have “style” attributes that are set to 
“document,” "use” attributes set to “literal,” 
    and the parameters should be inside a wrapper.
-This is particularly important when dealing with complex types; for primitive 
types, no problems are anticipated.</p>
+This is particularly important when dealing with complex types. For primitive 
types, no problems are anticipated.</p>
 <h3 id="currently-untested-features">Currently untested features<a 
class="headerlink" href="#currently-untested-features" title="Permanent 
link">&para;</a></h3>
 <p>The following are untested and, although not proven to fail, the behaviour 
is currently undefined. 
 For this reason, it is advised to avoid these features.</p>
 <ul>
 <li>
 <p><strong>Multiple WSDL imports.</strong> 
-   Taverna has only been tested on services that contain no more than one 
import of an additional WSDL file. 
+   Taverna has only been tested on services that contain <em>no more than 
one</em> import of an additional WSDL file. 
    For WSDLs that import more than one additional WSDL, particularly if that 
WSDL has a different service endpoint to the others,
      the behaviour of Taverna is currently unclear. 
    Its expected that it will fail when invoking the Web service.
-   <em>This does not affect imports of schemas, which has been thoroughly 
tested and works as expected.</em></p>
+   <em>This does not affect import of schemas, which has been thoroughly 
tested and works as expected.</em></p>
 </li>
 <li>
 <p><strong>Multiple service endpoints.</strong> For a given WSDL, Taverna 
currently only references the first service endpoint. 
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ For this reason, it is advised to avoid
 <li>
 <p><strong>Ambiguous type names.</strong> 
    In the unusual case that an operation requires inputs that contain 
identically named types 
-      that belong to different namespaces, it is expected that Taverna should 
not have any problems. 
+      belonging to different namespaces, it is expected that Taverna should 
not have any problems. 
    However, because of the unusual nature of this it is untested and therefore 
not recommended.</p>
 </li>
 </ul>
@@ -268,11 +268,11 @@ For this reason, it is advised to avoid
 </li>
 </ul>
 <h2 id="advertise-your-life-sciences-services-with-biocatalogue">Advertise 
your Life Sciences services with BioCatalogue<a class="headerlink" 
href="#advertise-your-life-sciences-services-with-biocatalogue" 
title="Permanent link">&para;</a></h2>
-<p>Registering your service in the <a 
href="http://www.biocatalogue.org/";>BioCatalogue</a> 
-      Life Sciences Web Services registry is one of the best ways to make 
people aware of your services
+<p>Registering with the <a 
href="http://www.biocatalogue.org/";>BioCatalogue</a> 
+      Life Sciences Web Services registry is one of the best ways to raise 
awareness of your services
       and to make them easily discoverable from Taverna and the Web.</p>
 <p>With BioCatalogue, service providers can easily register, describe, 
advertise and monitor their Web services. 
-   Users can easily find the right Web service using BioCatalogue's powerful 
search and filtering. 
+   Users can quickly find the right Web service using BioCatalogue's powerful 
search and filtering. 
 BioCatalogue provides combined information about services from both providers 
and community 
    as it has on-going expert curation as well as social curation by the 
community.</p></div>
 


Reply via email to