This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

github-merge-queue[bot] pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/texera.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
     new 279e12b2cd fix(ci): stop cancelling in-progress Backport Approvals 
runs (#8523)
279e12b2cd is described below

commit 279e12b2cd469c5cadaf69d987513f9b2552e2e6
Author: Meng Wang <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Mon Sep 21 05:49:34 2026 +0000

    fix(ci): stop cancelling in-progress Backport Approvals runs (#8523)
    
    ### What changes were proposed in this PR?
    
    `Backport Approvals` is a required status check on `main`, and GitHub
    evaluates the LATEST check run with that name. The workflow's
    concurrency group had `cancel-in-progress: true`, so when two PR events
    land close together (a push right after a review request or a label
    change), the newer run cancels the older one — and when the older run's
    "cancelled" terminal state is recorded after the newer run's success,
    the required check reads as failed and the merge button is blocked. This
    happened on #8516: the check showed a cancelled run as its latest state
    while a sibling run of the same commit had already passed; re-running
    the cancelled run unblocked the merge.
    
    The job completes in seconds, so cancellation saves nothing. This stops
    cancelling the in-progress run (`cancel-in-progress: false`). GitHub
    still keeps at most one pending run per concurrency group and replaces
    it on a newer event, but a replaced pending run is cancelled before its
    successor even starts, so its cancelled state can never land last: the
    latest check run on the commit always ends as a real verdict. A skipped
    intermediate evaluation loses nothing, because the job reads the live
    labels and reviews at run time rather than the event payload.
    
    ### Any related issues, documentation, discussions?
    
    Closes #8522. Observed on #8516 (a cancelled `Backport Approvals` run
    blocked an otherwise green merge).
    
    ### How was this PR tested?
    
    Config-only change to the workflow's concurrency setting; no executable
    code path changes. Verified the failure mechanism on #8516: the blocked
    merge showed the cancelled run as the latest `Backport Approvals` check
    run, and re-running it (6s pass) unblocked the merge immediately.
    
    ### Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
    
    Yes. Generated-by: Claude Code (Claude Fable 5, Anthropic). Reviewed by
    the author before submission.
    
    🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
    
    ---------
    
    Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <[email protected]>
---
 .github/workflows/backport-approval-check.yml | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/.github/workflows/backport-approval-check.yml 
b/.github/workflows/backport-approval-check.yml
index f37a52505c..6f92f08935 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/backport-approval-check.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/backport-approval-check.yml
@@ -58,7 +58,15 @@ permissions:
 
 concurrency:
   group: backport-approvals-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.ref 
}}
-  cancel-in-progress: true
+  # Never cancel the run in progress: this is a required status check, and 
GitHub
+  # takes the LATEST check run with this name -- a cancelled in-progress run's
+  # terminal state can land after a newer run's success (the job is seconds 
long)
+  # and block the merge as a failed required check. GitHub still keeps at most 
one
+  # pending run per group and replaces it on a newer event, but a replaced 
pending
+  # run is cancelled before its successor even starts, so the last word on the
+  # commit is always a real verdict. A skipped intermediate event loses 
nothing:
+  # the job reads the live labels and reviews at run time, not the event 
payload.
+  cancel-in-progress: false
 
 jobs:
   backport-approvals:

Reply via email to