Fixed some types in GLV tests that were failing for .NET CTR

Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/commit/bbc96eea
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/tree/bbc96eea
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/diff/bbc96eea

Branch: refs/heads/TINKERPOP-1897
Commit: bbc96eeaf41e97ec0fecc1e7a36da824e9654015
Parents: 2ddf2e3
Author: Stephen Mallette <sp...@genoprime.com>
Authored: Thu Mar 1 10:07:33 2018 -0500
Committer: Stephen Mallette <sp...@genoprime.com>
Committed: Thu Mar 1 10:07:33 2018 -0500

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 .../Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs                    |  4 +---
 gremlin-test/features/map/Order.feature             | 16 ++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------


http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/blob/bbc96eea/gremlin-dotnet/test/Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest/Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git 
a/gremlin-dotnet/test/Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest/Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs 
b/gremlin-dotnet/test/Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest/Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs
index a8c25ec..3b39cd3 100644
--- 
a/gremlin-dotnet/test/Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest/Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs
+++ 
b/gremlin-dotnet/test/Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest/Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs
@@ -43,9 +43,7 @@ namespace Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest.Gherkin
             { "g_withBulkXfalseX_withSackX1_sumX_V_out_barrier_sack", 
IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation },
             { 
"g_V_hasXname_markoX_propertyXfriendWeight_outEXknowsX_weight_sum__acl_privateX",
 IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation },
             { "g_V_outE_weight_groupCount_unfold_selectXkeysX_unfold", 
IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation },
-            { "g_V_outE_weight_groupCount_selectXkeysX_unfold", 
IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation },
-            { 
"g_V_hasLabelXpersonX_group_byXnameX_byXoutE_weight_sumX_orderXlocalX_byXvaluesX",
 IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation },
-            { 
"g_V_hasLabelXpersonX_group_byXnameX_byXoutE_weight_sumX_unfold_order_byXvalues_decrX",
 IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation }
+            { "g_V_outE_weight_groupCount_selectXkeysX_unfold", 
IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation }
         };
         
         private static class Keywords

http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/blob/bbc96eea/gremlin-test/features/map/Order.feature
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/gremlin-test/features/map/Order.feature 
b/gremlin-test/features/map/Order.feature
index e7ff00c..6dd8ac4 100644
--- a/gremlin-test/features/map/Order.feature
+++ b/gremlin-test/features/map/Order.feature
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ Feature: Step - order()
     When iterated to list
     Then the result should be ordered
       | result |
-      | 
m[{"vadas":"d[0].d","peter":"d[0.2].d","josh":"d[1.4].d","marko":"d[1.9].d"}] |
+      | 
m[{"vadas":"d[0].i","peter":"d[0.2].d","josh":"d[1.4].d","marko":"d[1.9].d"}] |
 
   Scenario: g_V_localXbothE_weight_foldX_order_byXsumXlocalX_decrX
     Given the modern graph
@@ -203,12 +203,12 @@ Feature: Step - order()
     When iterated to list
     Then the result should be ordered
       | result |
-      | l[d[1.0].f,d[0.4].f,d[1.0].f] |
-      | l[d[0.4].f,d[0.5].f,d[1.0].f] |
-      | l[d[0.4].f,d[0.4].f,d[0.2].f] |
-      | l[d[1.0].f]                   |
-      | l[d[0.5].f]                   |
-      | l[d[0.2].f]                   |
+      | l[d[1.0].d,d[0.4].d,d[1.0].d] |
+      | l[d[0.4].d,d[0.5].d,d[1.0].d] |
+      | l[d[0.4].d,d[0.4].d,d[0.2].d] |
+      | l[d[1.0].d]                   |
+      | l[d[0.5].d]                   |
+      | l[d[0.2].d]                   |
 
   Scenario: g_V_group_byXlabelX_byXname_order_byXdecrX_foldX
     Given the modern graph
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ Feature: Step - order()
       | m[{"marko":"d[1.9].d"}]  |
       | m[{"josh":"d[1.4].d"}]  |
       | m[{"peter":"d[0.2].d"}]  |
-      | m[{"vadas":"d[0].d"}]  |
+      | m[{"vadas":"d[0].i"}]  |
 
   Scenario: 
g_V_asXvX_mapXbothE_weight_foldX_sumXlocalX_asXsX_selectXv_sX_order_byXselectXsX_decrX
     Given the modern graph

Reply via email to