Fixed some types in GLV tests that were failing for .NET CTR
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/commit/bbc96eea Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/tree/bbc96eea Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/diff/bbc96eea Branch: refs/heads/TINKERPOP-1897 Commit: bbc96eeaf41e97ec0fecc1e7a36da824e9654015 Parents: 2ddf2e3 Author: Stephen Mallette <sp...@genoprime.com> Authored: Thu Mar 1 10:07:33 2018 -0500 Committer: Stephen Mallette <sp...@genoprime.com> Committed: Thu Mar 1 10:07:33 2018 -0500 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- .../Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs | 4 +--- gremlin-test/features/map/Order.feature | 16 ++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/blob/bbc96eea/gremlin-dotnet/test/Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest/Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/gremlin-dotnet/test/Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest/Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs b/gremlin-dotnet/test/Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest/Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs index a8c25ec..3b39cd3 100644 --- a/gremlin-dotnet/test/Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest/Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs +++ b/gremlin-dotnet/test/Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest/Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs @@ -43,9 +43,7 @@ namespace Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest.Gherkin { "g_withBulkXfalseX_withSackX1_sumX_V_out_barrier_sack", IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation }, { "g_V_hasXname_markoX_propertyXfriendWeight_outEXknowsX_weight_sum__acl_privateX", IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation }, { "g_V_outE_weight_groupCount_unfold_selectXkeysX_unfold", IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation }, - { "g_V_outE_weight_groupCount_selectXkeysX_unfold", IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation }, - { "g_V_hasLabelXpersonX_group_byXnameX_byXoutE_weight_sumX_orderXlocalX_byXvaluesX", IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation }, - { "g_V_hasLabelXpersonX_group_byXnameX_byXoutE_weight_sumX_unfold_order_byXvalues_decrX", IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation } + { "g_V_outE_weight_groupCount_selectXkeysX_unfold", IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation } }; private static class Keywords http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/blob/bbc96eea/gremlin-test/features/map/Order.feature ---------------------------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/gremlin-test/features/map/Order.feature b/gremlin-test/features/map/Order.feature index e7ff00c..6dd8ac4 100644 --- a/gremlin-test/features/map/Order.feature +++ b/gremlin-test/features/map/Order.feature @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ Feature: Step - order() When iterated to list Then the result should be ordered | result | - | m[{"vadas":"d[0].d","peter":"d[0.2].d","josh":"d[1.4].d","marko":"d[1.9].d"}] | + | m[{"vadas":"d[0].i","peter":"d[0.2].d","josh":"d[1.4].d","marko":"d[1.9].d"}] | Scenario: g_V_localXbothE_weight_foldX_order_byXsumXlocalX_decrX Given the modern graph @@ -203,12 +203,12 @@ Feature: Step - order() When iterated to list Then the result should be ordered | result | - | l[d[1.0].f,d[0.4].f,d[1.0].f] | - | l[d[0.4].f,d[0.5].f,d[1.0].f] | - | l[d[0.4].f,d[0.4].f,d[0.2].f] | - | l[d[1.0].f] | - | l[d[0.5].f] | - | l[d[0.2].f] | + | l[d[1.0].d,d[0.4].d,d[1.0].d] | + | l[d[0.4].d,d[0.5].d,d[1.0].d] | + | l[d[0.4].d,d[0.4].d,d[0.2].d] | + | l[d[1.0].d] | + | l[d[0.5].d] | + | l[d[0.2].d] | Scenario: g_V_group_byXlabelX_byXname_order_byXdecrX_foldX Given the modern graph @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ Feature: Step - order() | m[{"marko":"d[1.9].d"}] | | m[{"josh":"d[1.4].d"}] | | m[{"peter":"d[0.2].d"}] | - | m[{"vadas":"d[0].d"}] | + | m[{"vadas":"d[0].i"}] | Scenario: g_V_asXvX_mapXbothE_weight_foldX_sumXlocalX_asXsX_selectXv_sX_order_byXselectXsX_decrX Given the modern graph