Fixed a grammar mistake in collections recipe CTR
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/commit/da05f940 Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/tree/da05f940 Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/diff/da05f940 Branch: refs/heads/TINKERPOP-1912-tp33 Commit: da05f9401100bb985c0697d06cb1a0487b14275f Parents: df7870a Author: Stephen Mallette <sp...@genoprime.com> Authored: Wed Apr 11 08:56:22 2018 -0400 Committer: Stephen Mallette <sp...@genoprime.com> Committed: Wed Apr 11 08:56:22 2018 -0400 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- docs/src/recipes/collections.asciidoc | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/blob/da05f940/docs/src/recipes/collections.asciidoc ---------------------------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/docs/src/recipes/collections.asciidoc b/docs/src/recipes/collections.asciidoc index 61fee99..f44040a 100644 --- a/docs/src/recipes/collections.asciidoc +++ b/docs/src/recipes/collections.asciidoc @@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ g.V().fold().unfold().values('name') g.V().store('a').cap('a').unfold().values('name') ---- -The above examples show that `unfold()` works quite well when you want don't want to preserve the `List` structure of -the traverser as it just flattens `List` traversers to the traversal stream. The above examples only have one `List` -as a result, but consider what happens when there is more than one: +The above examples show that `unfold()` works quite well when you don't want to preserve the `List` structure of the +traverser as it just flattens `List` traversers to the traversal stream. The above examples only have one `List` as a +result, but consider what happens when there is more than one: [gremlin-groovy,modern] ----
