[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16034632#comment-16034632
]
Svetlin Zarev commented on TOMEE-2051:
--------------------------------------
[~romain.manni-bucau]Sure, I'll try to do it next week.
> JTA 1.2 compliance: @Transactional.rollbackOn regression
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TOMEE-2051
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2051
> Project: TomEE
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Svetlin Zarev
>
> We introduced a regression with (I guess) TOMEE-2049.
> Test cases (transnational bean methods):
> {code}
> //[1] Does not work - transaction is not marked for roll back
> @Transactional(rollbackOn = RollBackException.class)
> public void withRollBackOnWithDeclaredRuntimeException() throws
> RollBackException {
> throw new RollBackException("Roll back because of me! - exception
> declared in throws clause");
> }
> //[2]Works as expected
> @Transactional(rollbackOn = RollBackException.class)
> public void withRollBackOnWithoutDeclaredRuntimeException() {
> throw new RollBackException("Roll back because of me! - exception not
> declared in throws clause");
> }
> {code}
> Where RollbackException is a **RuntimeException**.
> In the case where the runtime exception is declared in the throws clause, the
> transaction is not rolled back, although rollbackOn=RollbackException is set.
> The root cause is in
> {code}
> private static boolean isNotChecked(final Exception e, final
> Class<?>[] exceptionTypes) {
> return RuntimeException.class.isInstance(e) &&
> (exceptionTypes.length == 0 ||
> !asList(exceptionTypes).contains(e.getClass()));
> }
> {code}
> Here *exceptionTypes* is the passed value of "method.getExceptionTypes()"
> passed from InterceptorBase:104
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
