This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

jmclean pushed a commit to branch develop
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/training.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this push:
     new 1288c1f  make slides clearer
1288c1f is described below

commit 1288c1f66ba058dc879288127fc4835ba086bfdf
Author: Justin Mclean <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Tue Oct 7 07:50:06 2025 +1100

    make slides clearer
---
 .../src/main/asciidoc/index.adoc                   | 26 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git 
a/content/Apache/Incubator/BrandingAndIdentity/src/main/asciidoc/index.adoc 
b/content/Apache/Incubator/BrandingAndIdentity/src/main/asciidoc/index.adoc
index a9d6d04..08bd8ab 100644
--- a/content/Apache/Incubator/BrandingAndIdentity/src/main/asciidoc/index.adoc
+++ b/content/Apache/Incubator/BrandingAndIdentity/src/main/asciidoc/index.adoc
@@ -70,15 +70,17 @@ A few simple checks early in incubation prevent bigger 
issues later.
 == Why Third-Party Branding Matters
 
 * Protecting the Apache Name  
-* Preventing Misrepresentation  
-* Preserving Vendor Neutrality  
-* Reducing Graduation Risks  
+* Ensuring proper use of the brand
+* Promoting vendor neutrality  
+* Supporting graduation  
 
 [.notes]
 --
-Introduce these four themes as the foundation of the session.  
-Each connects to ASF principles: shared stewardship, transparency, and 
independence.  
-You’ll expand on each with real-world examples and good practices.  
+Branding shapes how the project is seen and trusted.  
+The Apache name can be used by third parties, but only with proper attribution 
and context.  
+Clarify or correct misleading use early.  
+Keep messaging vendor-neutral.  
+Clear, consistent branding shows maturity and readiness to graduate.
 --
 
 == Protecting the Apache Name
@@ -98,16 +100,14 @@ Protecting the brand helps maintain ASF’s collective 
credibility.
 
 == Preventing Misrepresentation
 
-* Third parties may promote software or services as “official” when they are 
not.  
-* Without clarification, users may assume the ASF endorses a product or 
company.  
-* Friendly early conversations help maintain trust and avoid confusion.
+* Third parties must not present software or services as “official” Apache 
offerings.  
+* If this occurs, a friendly early clarification helps maintain trust and 
prevent confusion.
 
 [.notes]
 --
-Misrepresentation is often unintentional.  
-Vendors may not understand ASF’s structure or naming requirements.  
-Approach corrections gently: thank them for their enthusiasm, explain how ASF 
works, and share the branding page link.  
-Positive engagement builds relationships while protecting integrity.  
+Misrepresentation is usually unintentional, many vendors simply don’t 
understand ASF’s naming or branding rules.  
+Respond early and politely: acknowledge their support, explain how ASF naming 
works, and share the branding guidance link.  
+A friendly clarification protects community trust and the reputation of the 
Apache brand.
 --
 
 == Preserving Vendor Neutrality

Reply via email to