CaptainDuke commented on a change in pull request #8479: URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/8479#discussion_r680378831
########## File path: python/tvm/topi/cuda/scatter.py ########## @@ -787,44 +791,94 @@ def gen_ir(data_ptr, indices_ptr, updates_ptr, out_ptr): for i in data_ptr.shape: fused_shape *= i - # For now we avoid parallizing over dimensions indexed by `indices` as - # there may be repeated indices and hadling parallel accumulation can - # be hard. So we parallelize over X_M .. X_{N-1} instead. This will - # work well when these dimensions are large enough to saturate memory - # bandwidth, but performance will be bad when these dimensions are - # small. - bx = te.thread_axis("blockIdx.x") - tx = te.thread_axis("threadIdx.x") max_threads = int(tvm.target.Target.current(allow_none=False).max_num_threads) tdim = min(max_threads, fused_updates_dimension) - ib.scope_attr(tx, "thread_extent", tdim) - bdim = ceil_div(fused_updates_dimension, tdim) - ib.scope_attr(bx, "thread_extent", bdim) - - # Copy data into the output. This loop writes to the same portions of - # memory as the following loop, so we do not need a memory sync. - with ib.for_range(0, ceil_div(fused_shape, fused_updates_dimension), name="i") as i: - index = i * fused_updates_dimension + bx * tdim + tx - with ib.if_scope(bx * tdim + tx < fused_updates_dimension): + + with ib.new_scope(): + bdim = ceil_div(fused_shape, tdim) + bx = te.thread_axis("blockIdx.x") + tx = te.thread_axis("threadIdx.x") + ib.scope_attr(bx, "thread_extent", bdim) + ib.scope_attr(tx, "thread_extent", tdim) + + index = bx * tdim + tx + with ib.if_scope(index < fused_shape): out[index] = data[index] - with ib.for_range(0, fused_indices_dimension) as i: - j = bx * tdim + tx - with ib.if_scope(j < fused_updates_dimension): - offset = fused_updates_dimension - index = j # This is x_M, .. x_{N-1} part of the index into out. - # Build up the indices[0, y_0, .. y_{K-1}], .. indices[M-1, y_0, .. y_{K-1}] part - # of the index into out. - for l in reversed(range(indices_ptr.shape[0].value)): - # indices[i * l * fused_indices_dimension] = indices[l, y_0, ... y_{k-1}] - index += offset * indices[i + l * fused_indices_dimension] - offset *= data_ptr.shape[l] - if mode == "update": - out[index] = updates[i * fused_updates_dimension + j] - elif mode == "add": - out[index] += updates[i * fused_updates_dimension + j] - else: - raise NotImplementedError("scatter_nd mode not in [update, add]:", mode) + # For better performance, we introduce blockIdx.y to implement for-loops + # within one thread. + # The code is parallel over the scattered indices, so we use atomic_add + # to guarantee correctness when mode=="add" + + # For now, atomic is not supported by target "vulkan", "metal", or "cuda" with "int64" + # So we fallback to normal algorithm, using "+=" rather than atomic_add + + # TODO (CaptainDuke): + # Since multiple threads compete for the same write index, which leads to + # non-determinstic output for update mode. We could add a new attribute + # "allow_non_deterministic" to scatter_nd op, which is False by default. + # And change ONNX frontend to emit scatter_op with allow_non_deterministic = True, Review comment: Done -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@tvm.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org