junrushao1994 commented on a change in pull request #22: URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/22#discussion_r698098179
########## File path: rfcs/0022-tir-non-scalar-constants.md ########## @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ + +- Feature Name: tir_non_scalar_constants +- Start Date: 2021-06-01 +- RFC PR: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/22 +- GitHub Issue: TBD + +# 1. Summary + +This RFC proposes how non-scalar constants could be represented in TIR and used by passes in the lowering process. + +# 2. Motivation + +Currently, the non-scalar constants could be represented in Relay (relay.Constant) to be used by relay passes but not in TIR. Therefore, when performing lowering using TIR passes, we have to maintain a side-channel of tir::Var to constant non-scalar data mapping to perform transformations that could use the knowledge where some of the data are constants. + +Few example scenarios as further motivation : + +## Weight compression + +When lowering for accelerators (E.g. : [Arm(R) Ethos(TM)-U NPU](https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/11)), certain operations will need to get tiled to co-optimize performance and memory utilization. Such tiling patterns create slices of weights that need compressing that will end up with varying sizes. Therefore, the knowledge of some tir::Vars refer to constants are critical in the level of TIR to perform this. + +## Memory Planning + +The TIR program has the ability to express both inter and intra operator memory requirement, post-scheduling as explained further by [Unified Static Memory Planning RFC](https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/9). It would be better if the constants could be embedded to the TIR PrimFunc. Moreover, this allows various [target-dependent lowerings](https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/10), to produce TIR PrimFuncs with constants in it. Review comment: I am sorry but I am not sure if I understand this claim correctly. Do we need to understand the actual values inside the constants to do memory planning? My understanding is that if we know the shapes/dtypes, and the address to which the constants are stored in memory, then we can do all sorts of memory planning and prefetching stuff. Is that correct? Thanks a lot! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@tvm.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
