Lunderberg commented on pull request #10816: URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/10816#issuecomment-1083179609
Thank you, and I agree that this type of change requires a larger discussion. My intent was for this draft PR to be an option in that discussion, not a ready-to-merge change on its own, and I should have edited the commit messages to make that intention clearer. @vinx13 and I also had a brief chat on alternatives, and `elem_offset` may be avoidable altogether. I *think* the current use cases could be replaced with `match_buffer`/`buffer_bind_scope`, depending on whether a schedule is implemented in Schedulable TIR or in TE, along with using `buffer.data` of the subregion. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@tvm.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
