areusch commented on code in PR #11184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/11184#discussion_r862073877
##########
docker/with_the_same_user:
##########
@@ -36,7 +36,12 @@ else
rm /this_is_writable_file_system
fi
-getent group "${CI_BUILD_GID}" || addgroup --force-badname --gid
"${CI_BUILD_GID}" "${CI_BUILD_GROUP}"
+getent group "${CI_BUILD_GID}" || (
+ # Ensure "${CI_BUILD_GROUP}" is not already some other gid inside
container.
+ if grep -q "^${CI_BUILD_GROUP}:" /etc/group; then
+ CI_BUILD_GROUP="${CI_BUILD_GROUP}2"
Review Comment:
rather than do this, should we just set CI_BUILD_GROUP to the existing
group? i think having two groups with identical gid is a bit weird, though
cursory google does say it's supported. just curious if you tried this and
didn't like that appraoch?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@tvm.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
