areusch commented on PR #60: URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/60#issuecomment-1130426743
ok for A1 i'm good with named phases and we can modify as necessary. i think the A2.2 solution of directly registering target attrs makes sense to me. is that the direction we're aligned on here? we can discuss this next week at the community meeting, or if we're in alignment on these two items, i think all that remains is to update the RFC to reflect the discussion here and we can approve/merge. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@tvm.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
