jwfromm commented on code in PR #12717:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/12717#discussion_r966384283


##########
src/tir/schedule/primitive/compute_inline.cc:
##########
@@ -571,6 +596,34 @@ class ReverseComputeInliner : public BaseInliner {
   using BaseInliner::VisitExpr_;
   using BaseInliner::VisitStmt_;
 
+  /*! \brief Generate the predicate after inlining based on the consumer 
predicate */
+  PrimExpr BuildInlinedConsumerPredicate(const BlockRealizeNode* 
producer_block_realize) {
+    // Bind the producer block iter domains for simplification
+    Map<Var, PrimExpr> subst_map;
+    for (int i = 0, n = producer_block_realize->iter_values.size(); i < n; 
++i) {
+      const IterVar& iter = producer_block_realize->block->iter_vars[i];
+      analyzer.Bind(iter->var, Range::FromMinExtent(iter->dom->min, 
iter->dom->extent));
+      subst_map.Set(iter->var, producer_block_realize->iter_values[i]);
+    }
+    // Substitute the consumer block iters with the corresponding iters in the 
producer blocks
+    PrimExpr predicate = Substituter(this)(consumer_predicate_);
+    // Simplify the predicate using the producer block iter domains
+    predicate = analyzer.Simplify(predicate);

Review Comment:
   Just for my understanding, how does this bit work? I'm having a hard time 
seeing how the domain of consumer_predicate is compared to the producer domain 
through this substitution.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@tvm.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to