Lunderberg commented on issue #13508: URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/13508#issuecomment-1330735356
Thank you, and I'm seeing the same behavior with this example. Using f5a102c83, the lowering step runs in 0.18s, while using 101e3a4ad (just after PR#13217) the lowering step runs in 11.78s, the same 50x difference in performance that you're seeing. This definitely shouldn't be the case, as @masahi pointed out, since the additional analysis is disabled by default. I'm investigating into it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
