[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12587155#action_12587155 ]
Jan Kriesten commented on WICKET-1501: -------------------------------------- Johan - I return 'null' for the cacheKey of my template. That's fine. The Markup isn't cached _under_this_ key. The problem arises because wicket caches the Markup in putIntoCache also under the locationString - which has nothing to do with the cacheKey. So, markup is cached under two keys by wicket, which leads to the problem. Regards, --- Jan. > MarkupCache.putIntoCache doesn't behave correctly!! > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WICKET-1501 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1501 > Project: Wicket > Issue Type: Bug > Components: wicket > Affects Versions: 1.3.3 > Reporter: Jan Kriesten > Assignee: Juergen Donnerstag > Priority: Critical > > 'putIntoCache' checks for the locationString not to be null instead of the > cacheKey! > This way you always get old markup returned instead of the freshly supplied > markup which shouldn't be cached at all. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.