[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12651564#action_12651564 ]
Antony Stubbs commented on WICKET-1620: --------------------------------------- Thanks for having a look Ate. But my intention was for you to reply to the emails to the dev list about the implementation - you did not have to do all this work yourself, as I was going to do it. But too late now I guess. Before you go about understanding any of the code I wrote, let alone cleaning it up or fixing those errors, I think it would be most valuable to actually discuss the implementation, as it's not finalised, don't you think? > Portlet 2.0 support > ------------------- > > Key: WICKET-1620 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1620 > Project: Wicket > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: wicket > Reporter: Thijs Vonk > Assignee: Ate Douma > Attachments: myWicketPortal20Patch-example-project.patch, > myWicketPortal20Patch-v2.patch, > myWicketPortal20Patch-v3-example-project.patch, > myWicketPortal20Patch-v3.patch, portlet2-0.patch, portlet2-0.patch, > WICKET-1620-portlet2.0.patch > > > Upgrade wicket to fully support portlet 2.0 (jsr 286; > http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=286). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.