[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16619504#comment-16619504 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on WICKET-6587: ---------------------------------------- Github user svenmeier commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/292 Why not add a lookup to CheckBoxSelector instead: ``` public CheckBoxSelector(String id, CheckBox... boxes) { super(id); connectedCheckBoxes = boxes; } /** * Override if you need want the boxes to be collected dynamically. */ protected List<Check> getCheckBoxes() { return Arrays.asList(connectedCheckBoxes); } @Override protected CharSequence getFindCheckboxesFunction() { return String.format("Wicket.CheckboxSelector.getCheckboxesFunction(%s)", buildMarkupIdJSArrayLiteral(getCheckBoxes())); } ``` No need to hold references to all checkboxes, with the possibility of leakage when one is removed. > CheckBoxSelector should accept more CheckBoxes to be added later > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WICKET-6587 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6587 > Project: Wicket > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: wicket-core > Affects Versions: 8.0.0, 7.10.0 > Reporter: Carl-Eric Menzel > Assignee: Carl-Eric Menzel > Priority: Major > > CheckBoxSelector currently only allows attaching CheckBoxes at construction > time. Sometimes additional CheckBoxes may need to be added later. > I'm preparing a patch for this. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)