[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-7191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18106655#comment-18106655
 ] 

Laurent Almeras commented on WICKET-7191:
-----------------------------------------

Hi [~bitstorm] 

 

Thank you for your feedback, and the insights about bootstrap CSS (I'm not the 
CSS guy here, but we use bootstrap CSS for our app).

My concern is not about a new default wicket behavior. I just want to allow a 
smooth compatibility mode for existing applications and, when needed, a full 
server-side validation (to address consistency or usability concerns).

The linked bootstrap documentation gives a possible solution for these 
use-cases : using the `novalidate` attribute on `form` elements
 * `required` attribute can be set on input elements
 * client-side form validation is disabled, so validation behavior is performed 
by wicket
 * `novalidate` attribute may be installed at form or application-level (with a 
listener) in existing applications

This workaround also solves the `pattern` behavior when pattern is 
java/javascript compatible.

So as there is a way to allow full server-side :
 * OK for `required` change
 * mixed feelings about `pattern` (if pattern is not java/javascript compatible)
 * `placeholder` still is problematic

 

 

> Deprecate HTML5Attributes and move its logic to FormComponet hierarchy  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-7191
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-7191
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Andrea Del Bene
>            Assignee: Andrea Del Bene
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 11.0.0
>
>
> Tag attributes applied by  class behavior HTML5Attributes should now be 
> applied by default. We should deprecate this class and move its logic to 
> FromComponent#onComponentTag  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to